Re: [DMM] WG Review: Distributed Mobility Management (dmm)

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 07 October 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4B61A700A for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8q31U5hzkHF1 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B079D1A6FD3 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q1so6732364lam.4 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3MTv9SHHPgB8P8yZjoQ/hoHN2W+MVK4eE4dLaRtEv08=; b=saTWE+iTixzpKbhjZFn56N2u9H9Yd6EAkKZ44V6AO6AHEFuiJztlCLBwS3HAUGlW0O VRy/ZFVk+Hu0QLPCU8tn9CxYfVYPedD+21mz0U493eIFByL+4EvHWn3OuD5FKUwW/Ib9 1IwoCb3z0yhvDSqwCbSzKs13uGW7msRdeqHrJghEBYewPrPDGPL9FpnAd5NGBmhu3XhN 03sQX/yMSDuy2hYoU5TBGCCw5hACOK6g/WkU71n0hpyRV31g1eqgLrit4N7Y5d854gyt PTGfjnUEvDKt8VpwCLLpMlFOgPcBIhpZc8APPULmYILRPlyjlxnLsqTF0peo/FyyZ1HH zZKA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr5428847lae.6.1412700035046; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.77.37 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5433AEC0.6000104@gmail.com>
References: <20141003193829.9669.13386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADnDZ88K0XQ11bp9hVdSrDn58-1=NOtAYRr_Z6_pP==nbr=7rw@mail.gmail.com> <5433AEC0.6000104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:40:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceSmid6GHj9acJu-djDV-g-9GjWKw1QO=hg5gF17mySiw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/1_wzHKhob0x9-Xey73PA5HI1RSM
Cc: dmm WG <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] WG Review: Distributed Mobility Management (dmm)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:40:38 -0000

 Hi Satoru,

I copied Jouni's mail and removed ietf and iesg from the list.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the review. See my initial comments inline.
>
> 10/7/2014 8:50 AM, Abdussalam Baryun kirjoitti:
>>
>> Dear IESG,
>>
>> I received you message request for review, but there are some issues
>> missing for my review. For example there is no milestones presented even
>> though the submitted charter states below
>>
>>   "The working group may decide to extend the current milestones based on
>> the new information and knowledge gained during working on other
>> documents listed in the initial milestones. "
>
>
> When we submitted the re-charter text we were given an advice to leave them
> out - for some reason. Anyway, these were the milestones at the time of
> finishing the text in the WG:
>
>   Feb 2015 - Submit 'Enhanced mobility anchoring' as a working group
>              document. To be Proposed Standard.
>
>   Feb 2015 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' as a
>              working group document. To be Proposed Standard.
>
>   May 2015 - Submit 'Exposing mobility state to mobile nodes and network
>              nodes' as a working group document(s). To be Proposed
>              Standard.
>
>   Nov 2015 - Submit 'Enhanced mobility anchoring' submitted to the IESG.
>              To be Proposed Standard.
>
>   Nov 2015 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' submitted
>              to the IESG.  To be Proposed Standard.
>
>   Feb 2016 - Submit 'Exposing mobility state to mobile nodes and network
>              nodes' submitted to the IESG. To be Proposed Standard.
>

The above clearly states that three different protocols will be
developed by DMM as Proposed Standard.

You are an operator.
Can you please comment on the possibility of adoption by operators
three different protocols for DMM?

BTW there is no mention of deployment models and related milestones.

Regards,

Behcet