IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Mon, 21 December 2015 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9025D1ACE14 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:40:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y2YX-YV5GPOI for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BB71ACE13 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:40:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1212; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1450737645; x=1451947245; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=b6y5Me/mEIrcqrefrQHbbX4CC7f0Qz8kcKY6L9IlnOg=; b=Gr36k8caE519pcVjgISmXOBbHrtU9o7moW1FLuhnvK51A/NAFJlE+9Rv piI0k/FoRkj89Nkidnwx2ooij5M+b40shpUaKwAeI/d3iL14KvzKI5keY Ez8bhvxMN7SBEo8o+DZo7y7jZlnw6oRMqE2Lo/5TQCx30LdVsuhOkjGMx 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DAAgCpfnhW/4gNJK1egzpSbQaMTLEfAQ2BZCGFbAIcgRE4FAEBAQEBAQF/C0ESg2IBAQQjEUUQAgEIGAICJgICAh8RFRACBA4FiBoDEg6sfo4IDYQDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASBAYVVhH6CU4UkgUkFlwABi1KBeIFch22MB4Nog3MBIAEBQoQEcgGBYoIXgQgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,461,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="57586911"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Dec 2015 22:40:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBLMeiCX030603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:40:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:40:44 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-007.cisco.com ([173.36.7.17]) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com ([173.36.7.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:40:44 -0600
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls
Thread-Index: AQHRPECgUusgcnZuS0u/3m7JpNnOSA==
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:40:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D29DBE5C.1FF012%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <56719207.7000604@gmail.com> <1450439102.11602.25.camel@it.uc3m.es> <CAC8QAccjPjfbn_f4-ECh3CuB+-M9OmjZATcchyLUaqB15MFZ2w@mail.gmail.com> <D29DB522.1FEFFF%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAC8QAcejCuQiy==6fXzi=8JPK3h7Z1mPf4BGU_p2mdYxR+xPwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcejCuQiy==6fXzi=8JPK3h7Z1mPf4BGU_p2mdYxR+xPwA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.213]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E6232BDFEB8A7548A3534FC6B0B9F471@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/4SpRHu6l6fdRdoUmHqPpo5WtkrU>
Cc: 成 鹏 <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:40:47 -0000


On 12/21/15, 2:28 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
><sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Beat the protocol any time things don¹t go our way.
>>
>>
>> Published September 14, 2015
>>
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-07.txt
>>
>
>Have you read that draft? Here is the abstract:


No. I never read your drafts. Its possible your titles and references to a
protocol are clearly by accident. This is similar to your arguments which
mix up things and confuse the issue. Your real issue is with BBF Hybrid
Access work and you have a protocol in mind and which is fine. Blocking
some other extensions with these comments is unfortunate. An extension it
makes sense or not is based on WG interest and clearly this is also in
scope of the charter.


Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email