IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 22 December 2015 03:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4891B29DA for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3spsZ8lZACpq for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894FC1B29DB for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u7so52661950pfb.1 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HEnbo5IzIsGjFn15o2Qg5DLLKwz1REx7Dx4Z/60qpiM=; b=nNhrb9iMV1PUHFniPtH0ZkWjJ4iGTdNRnL7zyJdO+hFYYdiF4I52h61l6Rf725Xx5I 8/R3dbEk/sWg04xbuIaqx6p35SzF1fT5DV8BNUpmLoF3elMiEqb1e4FIuubG/Yz5sWb8 MGFq7ZrElA1EqVf1ongdWJ9WPKC7PBUQZbvEycGZkZCtdNjnwDY82C81YsP2WwhUidd6 +dE/YttAqJFkubSZ/vZlaZyIjWwxvXvjk0+X1mIsXCFlucZe7Y0FUwNAXwfws359wr7k +4iVonoeaWdL/eSwLYosLZG3t/TGkFli45w9skCZfLMD1Tg4L9PEP5TH+ZLHplnK40B1 1vqA==
X-Received: by 10.98.67.74 with SMTP id q71mr31732899pfa.134.1450756606283; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4204:228b:487e:5f16:636f:7a68? ([2601:647:4204:228b:487e:5f16:636f:7a68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 79sm37589084pfk.33.2015.12.21.19.56.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAccjPjfbn_f4-ECh3CuB+-M9OmjZATcchyLUaqB15MFZ2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:56:44 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73AFD314-B981-429A-B6A8-F8F906AB60D6@gmail.com>
References: <56719207.7000604@gmail.com> <1450439102.11602.25.camel@it.uc3m.es> <CAC8QAccjPjfbn_f4-ECh3CuB+-M9OmjZATcchyLUaqB15MFZ2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/YzGSLFyR7PgB5_i6C_MWkrFY744>
Cc: 成 鹏 <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:56:48 -0000

Behcet,

Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6 maintenance since these protocol families are already past their prime time as “hot research topics". Looking at the existing charter I cannot find too much love towards anything IPv4 so I think we can let MIPv4 finally rest in peace.

- Jouni


> On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jouni, all,
> 
> Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no one uses?
> For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find their places in
> the conferences or journals.
> 
> Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as well?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
>> Hi Jouni, all,
>> 
>> Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my post-adoption
>> call to the three drafts.
>> 
>> Carlos
>> 
>> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed:
>>>      draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-00
>>>      draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03
>>>      draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>>> 
>>> The adoption for the first two was unanimous. The last (draft-seita-
>>> *)
>>> received few concerns but the number of supporters was enough to
>>> convince the chairs there is enough interest and support to work on
>>> it.
>>> The chairs encourage the authors of draft-seite-* to pay close
>>> attention
>>> and work out the concerns raised during the adoption call.
>>> 
>>> For the I-D authors. Please, submit draft-ietf-*-00 versions of the
>>> documents as soon as possible.
>>> 
>>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email