IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu> Wed, 16 January 2019 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3756130F9D for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:32:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uhdz2hXKIDqi for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D98130E77 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CB4104CB9; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:32:37 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QwOF4duD0jWA; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:32:37 +0100 (CET)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (ENCELADUS.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DB3104CB7; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:32:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.223]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:32:32 +0100
From: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
Thread-Index: AQHUqEs3VTAjcTZYRUC5U1x6/vM4pqWx/8AA
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:31 +0000
Message-ID: <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26DE58E0DC4@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <D85B80D0.2E3465%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D85B80D0.2E3465%sgundave@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.170]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26DE58E0DC4PALLENEofficehd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/9BiR3IlycfPhN8nLrGq_bq2R7UI>
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:32:41 -0000

I support progressing this version of the document on the experimental track.

marco

From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt.

We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track.

The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document.  The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group.


The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback.

Document Link:
 https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt>

The target status for this document is "Experimental".

Please post any comments/concerns on the draft.


Thanks!
Dapeng & Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email