Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

[CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>]

Thanks a lot John! We'll address your comments in the next revision.

Carlos

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:11 PM John Kaippallimalil <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Review and comments on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.
>
>
>
> The text in the draft is clear, and it is ready to move forward in my view.
>
>
>
> A couple of comments below:
>
> (not repeating nits that Dirk has already posted)
>
>
>
> Section 3:
>
> “As another note, the solution described in this document allows
> performing per-prefix anchoring decisions, to support e.g., some flows to
> be anchored at a central Home-DPA (like a traditional LMA)”
>
> Would be good to clarify a bit here: is this a result of the MN requesting
> central anchoring (or not), or the result of the mobility topology (MAARs,
> CMDs).
>
>
>
> Section 3.4:
>
> Does the implementation with parallel operations need to mention something
> about race conditions.
> It is probably fine in practice, but not a completely safe operation
> (e.g., MAAR2 may forward data to MAAR1 before the route update at MAAR1 is
> complete)
>
> Overall – the draft looks really good and ready.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* dmm [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *
> [e-mail]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:18 AM
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG.
>
>
>
> I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent
> re-formatting:
>
> P.7
>
> the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1,
> and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA
>
>
>
> 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement
> (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and
> unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1
>
> P.9
>
> Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted
>
> ;-)
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards
>
> Dirk
>
>
>
> *From:* dmm <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
>
>
>
> Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC
> on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt.
>
>
>
> *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from
> Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the
> authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not
> sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep
> this on experimental track.*
>
>
>
> The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of
> reviews on this document.  The authors have addressed all the comments and
> there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the
> document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the
> working group.
>
>
>
>
>
> The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback.
>
>
>
> Document Link:
>
>  https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt
> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt>
>
>
>
> The target status for this document is “Experimental”.
>
>
>
> Please post any comments/concerns on the draft.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dapeng & Sri
>
>
>
>
>