Re: [dns-privacy] Moving things along...

"Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1660A1A0378 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:26:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWtgycFRq43f for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com [IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9056B1A034C for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5964B25CA253; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:26:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.iknowlaws.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFICu6ytdUUZ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:26:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kopoli (p5DCC7BCB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.123.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECC8725CA22E; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:26:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>
To: 'Warren Kumari' <warren@kumari.net>, dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iLZ6wy2zCDDhQLPwUaTtS2xgfeJx_rKy-X8Ry_KHxkKQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLZ6wy2zCDDhQLPwUaTtS2xgfeJx_rKy-X8Ry_KHxkKQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:26:50 +0100
Message-ID: <002201d04bb9$3a4a5f90$aedf1eb0$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJtRbZDkYLCBwYk3VA6X7jr3o66Epu85Pog
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/-kcDchNvvTAiNgJCZaMrSDUjhsY>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Moving things along...
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:26:57 -0000

Does it mean that you want to only go with solution to change DNS protocol?
You don't want to put any other solution in agenda which doesn't change much
the DNS protocol  such as cga-tsige. The might be more examples.

Best,
Hosnieh



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-privacy [mailto:dns-privacy-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Warren Kumari
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:48 PM
> To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: [dns-privacy] Moving things along...
> 
> Dear DPRIVE,
> 
> Apologies for the lack of momentum - your chairs had gotten sidetracked by
> holidays, lots of travel, day-jobs, etc and have not been giving the WG
the time
> it deserves.
> 
> Getting things moving again, we need to decide on a way forward.
> 
> We now have 2 primary document sets under consideration:
> A: Phillip Hallam-Baker's set:
> DNS Privacy and Censorship: Use Cases and Requirements -
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hallambaker-dnse-02
> Service Connection Service (SXS) -
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hallambaker-wsconnect-08
> Private-DNS - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hallambaker-privatedns-01
> 
> B:  The combined USC/Information Sciences, Verisign, VPN Consortium doc
> TLS for DNS: Initiation and Performance Considerations -
draft-hzhwm-dprive-
> start-tls-for-dns
> 
> We have 3 possible options here:
> 1: Adopt Phillip's set
> 2: Adopt the hzhwm-dprive-start-tls-for-dns doc
> 3: Adopt both, with the understanding that one will fall by the wayside.
> 
> I''d appreciate it if the WG can read both sets of documents, and start
> deciding which option best meets the WG's goals.
> 
> We expect to get the Aziz / Allison Mankin evaluation document next week,
> which will contain ways of describing the privacy goal and helping
evaluate
> how well it is attained; but we can, and should, read the document sets
before
> that.
> 
> W
> 
> 
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
in the
> first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at
> having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
>    ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy