IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] New draft on encrypting the stub-to-resolver link: draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 20 August 2014 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985271A0466 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhsWGZTTAS5x for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4197E1A04E9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7KIhuSk014791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:43:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4GpT_qA50n4DtMKh-V+zMd5=WtqppmZncYROAn_+qnCSEzCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:43:55 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC9A5FB4-478F-42C2-992D-7E00885C1030@vpnc.org>
References: <20140818175701.12317.96810.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FF99C324-2959-48EB-A187-18007F7AA364@vpnc.org> <CAJE_bqeoUx2gFsnVgZYfoWASkHaMgKW4tR552YRmQ4ZNzH1M=g@mail.gmail.com> <361D96E3-CD31-4E2B-88E3-46E44D6F8C3D@vpnc.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408191650420.22835@bofh.nohats.ca> <EFBD7F1F-EB4B-4EC4-BE08-C7C92EC471FF@vpnc.org> <CAFggDF2tdiUzGmEi9u68mubR6F+Lp7U4dy0N6R7PQVAQ_nNw=g@mail.gmail.com> <A22A1BAF-5B70-4574-AF92-B777FF5F89E9@vpnc.org> <CAFggDF0McW3JD9+mzSc2wpkorvkyR-v-GCn-FyhWUH9PcnCdMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4GpT_qA50n4DtMKh-V+zMd5=WtqppmZncYROAn_+qnCSEzCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Ulevitch <david@opendns.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/IFS5QQ7AItSzDxAGFlC4G7ixPUo
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] New draft on encrypting the stub-to-resolver link: draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:44:00 -0000

On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:34 AM, David Ulevitch <david@opendns.com> wrote:

> DNSCrypt has been well-described and is in use by millions of people today across a number of implementations.  Details available here: http://dnscrypt.org/  -- We can certainly do better.

Please do, given that there is nothing on that page that describes the actual protocol. 

> Happy to help push it along to a standard.

Please note that no one here was suggesting that, yet.

> I'll have one of our engineers get more involved in this list.  Thanks for the poke Jacob.

Great. Given your level of deployment, us knowing what the actual protocol is would be useful.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email