IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Tue, 26 May 2015 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05101AD210 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fdrH5-u53jST for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp11.mail2web.com (xsmtp11.mail2web.com [168.144.250.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCC31AD1EC for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.13] (helo=xmail03.myhosting.com) by xsmtp11.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1Yx4em-0007PH-CZ for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 22:31:52 -0400
Received: (qmail 30291 invoked from network); 26 May 2015 02:31:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO huitema1) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[24.16.156.113]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail03.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>; 26 May 2015 02:31:51 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: 'Guangqing Deng' <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>, 'dns-privacy' <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
References: <555C942F.2090007@gmail.com>, <CA+nkc8DK8320KAq8xWRbm4B8BLqPSErzyHxYZ6EPk1Uz4Mc6Og@mail.gmail.com>, <8F5C00A9-C218-4470-89C5-3A84DCBF1FA3@cisco.com> <2015052609540607241511@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2015052609540607241511@cnnic.cn>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 19:31:50 -0700
Message-ID: <006601d0975c$1fc0f870$5f42e950$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQE1PWTZObQwlzRQjCKyj0k8QHAdMwLhjTUaAoqrElUCsxG+cJ6DQr4Q
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/JfdwKJOIvz5JeOIwbEp7h7-7Tok>
Cc: 'Tim Wicinski' <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 02:31:55 -0000

> Resolution latency is very crucial for DNS system and the latency of DNS-over-DTLS is relatively low compared with DNS-over-TLS.

Do you have measurements showing that, or is it just an opinion?

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email