IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 26 May 2015 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4085F1ACE58 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oz6F8J6804bL for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C1E1ACE60 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (142-254-17-100.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4Q34f94022250 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 May 2015 20:04:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 142-254-17-100.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.100] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <2015052609540607241511@cnnic.cn>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:04:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CA5D135E-ED10-4814-BA25-49498AAC9CB2@vpnc.org>
References: <555C942F.2090007@gmail.com> <CA+nkc8DK8320KAq8xWRbm4B8BLqPSErzyHxYZ6EPk1Uz4Mc6Og@mail.gmail.com> <8F5C00A9-C218-4470-89C5-3A84DCBF1FA3@cisco.com> <2015052609540607241511@cnnic.cn>
To: Guangqing Deng <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ZgVHMfKZkd163BuVpBQaT7-nlGA>
Cc: dns-privacy <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 03:04:48 -0000

On May 25, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Guangqing Deng <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> Resolution latency is very crucial for DNS system and the latency of DNS-over-DTLS is relatively low compared with DNS-over-TLS.

Is the latency for an established TLS connection any worse than for a DTLS connection? It would be good to see numbers if this is the case.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email