IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls

"Guangqing Deng" <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn> Tue, 26 May 2015 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA64E1A0021 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1gFrkR005NS for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC98E1A0020 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Foxmail (unknown [218.241.103.77]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0CJkJTX62NVAiNZBw--.2515S2; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:43:19 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:42:16 +0800
From: Guangqing Deng <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <555C942F.2090007@gmail.com>, <CA+nkc8DK8320KAq8xWRbm4B8BLqPSErzyHxYZ6EPk1Uz4Mc6Og@mail.gmail.com>, <8F5C00A9-C218-4470-89C5-3A84DCBF1FA3@cisco.com>, <2015052609540607241511@cnnic.cn>, <CA5D135E-ED10-4814-BA25-49498AAC9CB2@vpnc.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 6, 42[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015052611421606732819@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart072785232620_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0CJkJTX62NVAiNZBw--.2515S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrurW8Jry8CrW8Cw1UuF43Awb_yoW3WFXEvr 4rXws7tw48Kr1UtaykK393Jr9rK3yjgF10ya9rZw4jvFy0kFy8KrsYyr92kr18Zry7GryD Xw1fJr1UKFy7ZjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbyAYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVAqjxCE 14ACF2xKxwAqx4xG6xAIxVCFxsxG0wAqx4xG6I80eVA0xI0YY7vIx2IE14AGzxvEb7x7Mc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wCY02Avz4vE14v_Gr 4l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWU GVWUWwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7V AKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j 6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw CI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJwCE64xvF2IEb7IF0Fy7YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU 0xZFpf9x07jrjjkUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: 5ghqww5xdqw1xlqjqupqqluhdfq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/sZU3le8jSLPAYbPhvNcMTGG_MHM>
Cc: dns-privacy <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 03:43:28 -0000

I only mean the latency when establishing connections. 
 


Guangqing Deng
CNNIC 
 
From: Paul Hoffman
Date: 2015-05-26 11:04
To: Guangqing Deng
CC: dns-privacy
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call For Adoption: draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls
On May 25, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Guangqing Deng <dengguangqing@cnnic.cn> wrote:
> Resolution latency is very crucial for DNS system and the latency of DNS-over-DTLS is relatively low compared with DNS-over-TLS.
 
Is the latency for an established TLS connection any worse than for a DTLS connection? It would be good to see numbers if this is the case.
 
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email