IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F57B3A07A5 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:13:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UurYMshhGPe0 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDCF3A07A9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id p9so7231576wmc.2 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:13:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V32qKhzKOpasXYpPEGJxanux6CtUQ5Nv3KD2WxzFQ/o=; b=dM2G5cHd4qNhe3YY/EftR6oZ89xMOFhnD97xnNmP5SiOHOf5U123+xHwUu9zgh7BcR 3zVCv8JbTWEdYLuaXN6V5Y/OGlUteBV7XkxVILJrECRn1iNQub0A3D/5EnH63JyqwE8M 3AOeN2Ir/AmCa6nYqDn+Uk2fJVKxbHFR0QK8+4amMlTGyVmXFhAwZyJ8rlGYed7JzKxF Fco+IhDTXJ8w7Zl4hZQkcESw29PzVLs3E7HqZ7SO6jLhHmR6dLCgCfjWk8LOlHxmonMs +vccMVzxz0aqAJXzgimFq1WT6ZMba5eEVES4dG4qZrxjcKLxJj9eE73rlI+q2aPzUkz4 LpOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V32qKhzKOpasXYpPEGJxanux6CtUQ5Nv3KD2WxzFQ/o=; b=KUJl1mB1HFNtn9C51PZyb6h/CvEJ4Uw/C8utxs5gwrbMFfeahsoe3lB1dQHU/ZSJuE xtGCzVbasDQUImQO3CPi1k/p1bWlCZ0pmTU5TKifoaMjEzcBA6niXK9WzXDbUVpTvEdL NoZadOX2G58oLvKmN9cnsJy3HwAD410yQVTlTukbexukZavvqsmeapk5g4XKMvzBpI4C 9VvhdEgPm0lvwZgofI9V2b+Y7nXI7XKvEkAOdNYtpjU33KRM4tr8nkDUC17PJWYiOG/g f35sJQfeOHmaq2cHggH3hJt2zjWBJfn/LpQmP2UO77t5fanHzUR6xUSShzefhIt6tmZ1 31zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Pob1ptOdXvi5ny6J3g1KOzpxtQBoPhCf70ZlkQbjkkXyFfzxQ t0RqVOxhq8bey6gVoGfDIUAdKcwe6rgByczxTxv+Nw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv7vnhB+ukjV1lzCH2cDTngoTxtmuoC2tt6lY0u7pKm0UpCq1cZWN4svmTi5uvIytYHbx+NewhFdTggvu81Sxw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2951:: with SMTP id n17mr10108980wmd.97.1583428432611; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:13:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158100793900.5172.2649631873195856414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0643CFB9-1AA8-4F75-AF83-9F5FDF0F3E0A@sinodun.com> <CAHbrMsD=k1Z0t9rPkP053UkwAG-q0QXp5OU4ES2kdpPXHvw=cQ@mail.gmail.com> <6D575D82-F95D-44BC-90D6-652F1C7F3508@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D575D82-F95D-44BC-90D6-652F1C7F3508@sinodun.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:13:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsDzX3U05+7-QisKd312gZ_x6ZEYx3TQ5rp+rWuDah0mYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op@ietf.org, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000004b2a5e05a01ea9b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/M8hgqvVQnmy-gYEp9nWwf9lLns8>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:13:57 -0000

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 8:35 AM Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:

>
> How about:
>
> “We do not know of a court precedent relating to the question of whether
> simply using a DNS resolution service constitutes consent from the user for
> the operator to process their query data"
>

That sounds like a significant improvement to me.

Note that "precedent" is a term used by primarily in "common law"
jurisdictions like the UK and US, so it may not be meaningful to all
readers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent#Civil_law_systems

>
> > This document also has only limited scope… I would say that this text has
> >> DPRIVE consensus for its application specifically to DNS privacy
> services..
> >>
> >
> > All the other optimization sections are described as bare actions for the
> > operator to take.  Only this one contains normative language.  I would
> > suggest removing the "should”.
>
> This lower case ’should' is not intended as normative but happy to modify
> for clarity.
>

Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email