Re: [dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> Wed, 17 March 2021 15:20 UTC
Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B08C3A0FF9; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VPXZDhlTMwJ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1433A0FF7; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id 302215F40ADE; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [100.64.0.1] (p54b8a4dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.184.164.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38C0F5F405E0; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:20:03 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <5D20F6EE-9EBC-458B-82E8-7F8F52BB42F4@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <161598609053.11409.15392713719536390640@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <161598609053.11409.15392713719536390640@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/N2JVAyHK_-rkmRv90UaZlnJIRlA>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:20:10 -0000
Moin! On 17 Mar 2021, at 14:01, IETF Secretariat wrote: > The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh in state > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Brian Haberman) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/ I oppose adopting this draft. It would make DNS resolution an operational nightmare and it has nearly nothing to do with DNS as all the interactions are HTTPs based. This is sort of name resolution via HTTPs TOR and while this may be a use case for bad actors wanting to hide there transactions I don’t see a use case for the wider internet population, and more specifically how people who provide Internet access (operators) are going to cope with this. So long -Ralf ——- Ralf Weber
- [dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-paul… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-… Ralf Weber