IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> Wed, 17 March 2021 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ericorth@google.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443B13A0EBA for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iQfCP6E2zLd for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3BF3A0EB2 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 18so3476508lff.6 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9rItHltvcPAtau5M55G6JK3zrFElrDG7f0tdI/9qlGU=; b=TwsUTWNsuyp/uGOw3HdPA//uG3ilngvebZszgH8ZYzGc+Hn4VvtcSDqtLmtUgGGqoW jWrCFD/Oh7Cv4/r25IgJDztBcFtpxLQu/CWHngtMOcLWl76dBNpw20kFTKG4NlWenl0C VeXMz+CN7Z3mLClYnWM3JAJ6oFYY33+pTW6sMv5x1BASpkX3RmwVPTdMCCsuk21T/srn ao0z+XDH+Yt0Ed6aO7q7ojB/fyVw/ciGeIF9NssufuoNBDOXqonlkYRvhaL5JVC4IkmX fSpekN/UYlGEoDiG+JlR9ZiuUSX/VmyTgfX4TcG7c+t8zNW2K9TTVzu+5iVaG5EDlamU ua2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9rItHltvcPAtau5M55G6JK3zrFElrDG7f0tdI/9qlGU=; b=lbvD02GfJHsO1wR1GuxDQyRhMuGqxIV8C/Zy2hYsbXm3bcv6to6aWFvExsDEonXXqQ PwjcB1Vju9gXiTeu5E9fPjnyasHundTmKFEzesrM8Vpq9D6rYVjcd+B+tqqEqKAvowIg CMANwADv4mQD7wivPrHZpBDgoRhWeJckKdqG/mb9Q7Mr2mS0X/e+N3lpaLs5IWGGzoP3 aNxTscb07M+0VHHxTuNBD1s4AB9xIcJHB5Mp2v/EtooHCVlNBXOC+3vbN8Q6O84OORtx 7eeGK9lru2vAjQu+GVwPumwM/D8uPHhrKWO1zniqxvPpSTQoenZ5FAvLWATmEtpuLIec JXGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/Tcl61YN6yHhBqCP7Hmi3kNdIU/q1qn3xYhymNGwNeRvPRAUS mMLZuR0Cm011oGMdL4GkiCrl11FUFRjoqGlAuKHrXEqQlxg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLKrzKd+dD+A2yA+Ca+56VQoRjVK17vwmGABmdqVrRJ88yfoHUBzUfytcCKEpuBXQ+9TcXaaZgF1CXgOm6xJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a0b:: with SMTP id q11mr2570163lfn.391.1615993609075; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <899CCC5E-A524-4BDA-A385-DCE80C6BF08B@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <899CCC5E-A524-4BDA-A385-DCE80C6BF08B@icann.org>
From: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:06:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMOjQcE-NY4ewe1GPdh=BF1+F=8_eZtejeJ6ghi47SbNREVuUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000078cff05bdbcd5cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/W3i2sKhLMs7GKvS8Z-aZo9EPTK4>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:06:53 -0000

I support adoption.  I think there's strong potential for browsers and
other clients to find ways to make use of this without necessarily finding
users that understand it to explicitly enable/configure it.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:58 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
wrote:

> > Please reply to the mailing list with your views (positive or negative)
> > on the WG adopting the document and your supporting arguments.
>
> During the WG meeting last week, I expressed strong negative views about
> adoption. The ensuing discussion helped change my opinion. I was looking at
> this as "there are almost no users who would want to turn this on", but
> then came around to "there are browsers who would want to turn this on for
> the benefit of their users". If the browser takes responsibility for the
> additional delay in responses, and takes responsibility for watching for
> the new failure modes and remediating them, then this protocol might be
> worthwhile even though it adds delay and complexity.
>
> The deciding factor for me was that the authors turned over protocol
> control to the WG. The "we've already implemented this" tone in the various
> presentations in the past few months caused me to assume the opposite.
>
> Thus, I mildly support adoption.
>
> --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email