IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Tue, 30 March 2021 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840D93A198D for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7KzetrX9z3W for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB273A1991 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F78D14095A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:01:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <378ea84d-8400-61ca-dffc-602eee359659@nic.cz>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:01:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/LlG0frutC4gAjVDnMnoxrTPeK6c>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:01:18 -0000

Not for Standards Track, in the current situation.

I think O-HTTP will be a better fit for the author's intentions, as I 
can't see significant DNS-specific stuff in the proposal. Moreover, if a 
similar DNS-specific protocol was being made, I'd question why it needs 
an HTTP layer (which is basically the familiar DoH vs. DoT argument).

--Vladimir @ knot-resolver.cz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email