IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743D83A2F09 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndokpOQptKTr for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD693A2F06 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9812B2421544; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcE7WeB1ijYdjmb39yt2szJvW3wc8kfDNc6chF7S51=+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:33:31 +0000
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6D5870D-C944-4BDE-A7A3-87E6E17D27D8@rfc1035.com>
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <86e54685-ab6e-83b5-e4f6-bbd71fc6dd5a@nic.cz> <CABcZeBOgE=ABFwErsYFrjSRWFXgcJp_JncVXbwcaiDf3iFs7RA@mail.gmail.com> <AF91913A-42A1-4832-8113-F576C4AA4684@apple.com> <6E546D21-9B96-42DA-A488-4BC0E8E7A4AB@rfc1035.com> <CAMOjQcE7WeB1ijYdjmb39yt2szJvW3wc8kfDNc6chF7S51=+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Orth <ericorth=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/xVYLdSdImgNn9EOh9PZcGLUMXNk>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:33:37 -0000


> On 18 Mar 2021, at 16:21, Eric Orth <ericorth=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I disagree with your assumption that clients/users are only concerned about particular resolvers. 

Eric, I didn’t make any assumptions about that at all. It was Tommy who said ODNS would benefit those who were concerned about leakage to very large public resolvers. All I did was suggest a simpler alternative that wouldn’t need an RFC or the introduction of more complexity and lots more moving parts.

If the aim of ODNS is to prevent leakage to resolvers *in general*, then that’s a different story. But as I said the use case and problem statement isn’t (yet) compelling enough. The cost/benefit analysis is unclear too. YMMV.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email