IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh

Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ericorth@google.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04043A2ED8 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zMrfeAVeijK5 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70833A2EDA for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 184so8220744ljf.9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IIWNiuGqKjGPKz/x72LXB2V5tCtLc2g7jq0x0tu0T5Y=; b=nNwXyYhOUuqmFnOUeKdBKbR8RCnNMFVONWKs/1PuO5IezAWof7BArH5f0ss85+Duzh oVTsDhT/kz+AS0SGUPODf9qwaNkmd28hnNcmVf3lyFTzOe/Va+Icol1RXSakDcfXUvVT MBmaQB+45qYm3nFTKpzOOvVEUdd+So34EcZI6ahjPeSKuEyseKNRy6KqI0o70xB53dzG tsutzUTquV9TJ3fV2Qz6lv3Nh97XgBdrfy6orM30LBHoUaFxEFGm0Da4kJqAflA3OCkn o6dVFKdCBBO/GXg6MHXXpisJEPhfE1N3VM2oBRgs4T5HkwZPtNSN9FNQpoKRTn6TtO9y B4+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IIWNiuGqKjGPKz/x72LXB2V5tCtLc2g7jq0x0tu0T5Y=; b=NQ1GDZP8H7p/+TyJhuLLn0aRK4jNdMVreNunfAqwjo7Tj3Dk5Vz+Zc2So7khh80AQT ZPK/M2Dw9NFEiLTYBp1c7hIIeTpI6NeIVSED9TKLy2lXwm/6iXkAm9LRgghbcD6ac20S zEm5cH5vNanFyFjwtk4DY0FTMUT5epejslhW8erZtbevSk/pjPYjUHv2czh+W1fBPyd8 xD882B1WNC5c9MRPHajxxJH3KkKFuTSFwiVYsFJvN1c3tRyP5nPMHbM5EnhSNTqnm9kN i2rltP28aMoKMt5KQpkk7l105wku0F5sgZEWJruZBwU/p3E7u+1XyWnqBEraq0CpvOwZ 7e9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pHrnaVOPU+vTtQb3OhiJ/Vyfi6eEkfX/kb2J8I7NXm5Rck1B+ CXptnN4L1sP+lk4YUdh362iDtUFAXDI2IgoQcNzZeg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7X24upd2gX88cqM7Vzgfly2uLOxZ5kVf5lB54308qmh5xK06bPbLQj9Ai5UtPidO5+vUdzhURzqmbZ2sW/8k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:95d6:: with SMTP id y22mr5741300ljh.361.1616084519702; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1a1ef163-bef8-0726-8e51-e444e8fe6091@innovationslab.net> <86e54685-ab6e-83b5-e4f6-bbd71fc6dd5a@nic.cz> <CABcZeBOgE=ABFwErsYFrjSRWFXgcJp_JncVXbwcaiDf3iFs7RA@mail.gmail.com> <AF91913A-42A1-4832-8113-F576C4AA4684@apple.com> <6E546D21-9B96-42DA-A488-4BC0E8E7A4AB@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E546D21-9B96-42DA-A488-4BC0E8E7A4AB@rfc1035.com>
From: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:21:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMOjQcE7WeB1ijYdjmb39yt2szJvW3wc8kfDNc6chF7S51=+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b9c33d05bdd1ff99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/aBzkAXEz_DPXpS5FwfhKvn_hIZM>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] WG Call for Adoption: draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:22:06 -0000

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:10 PM Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 18 Mar 2021, at 15:42, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Instead, cases where clients are particularly concerned about revealing
> client IP and identity to very large public resolvers benefit more from
> this.
>
> There’s a much easier and far quicker solution for that problem. Clients
> who have those concerns can (and should be able to) point their queries
> elsewhere.
>
> How about an RFC that says “don't use Quad-X if you’re concerned about
> revealing your IP address or identity to those services”?
>
I disagree with your assumption that clients/users are only concerned about
particular resolvers.  I think many of the users/clients involved here are
concerned about privacy exposure to any and all resolvers, and thus
changing resolvers is not a solution.


>
> I’m sceptical about Oblivious DNS because the use case and problem
> statement isn’t compelling enough, at least to me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email