[dns-privacy] Next steps : draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,
      Tim, Éric, and I have chatted about the next steps for the 
unilateral probing draft. Here is the proposed plan for moving the draft 
forward as Experimental:

1. The authors verify that the implementations listed in Appendix A is 
up-to-date. The chairs will request that this list be retained in the 
published RFC.

2. The authors capture the key metrics submitted to the mailing list for 
assessing the experiment in a new appendix. The chairs believe that the 
below metrics proposed by Scott Hollenbeck are a good starting point but 
other WG participants may have other proposed metrics:

      A. Measurement of CPU and memory use between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
      B. Measurement of query response rates between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
      C. Measurement of server authentication successes and failures.
      D. Measurement and descriptions of observed attack traffic, if any.

3. The chairs will solicit a volunteer (or volunteers) to collect 
information on any interoperability testing that has been carried out 
between implementations that support this specification.

Once the WG is comfortable with the experimentation section and the 
metrics, the chairs will submit the draft to the IESG for publication. 
We will propose to revisit the status of the document twelve (12) months 
after publication as an RFC.

Any concerns or suggestions on the above plan?

Regards,
Brian