Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Rob Sayre <> Wed, 07 October 2020 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0810B3A13CC; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CRGainsUa4nh; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A0A3A0F2E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id q1so3725421ilt.6; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PHhTvJvlp282geyvnN6lqmtIre2JqU8zIfc24ooZxy8=; b=dtMTN40YTs3fi37iiNd/4zi1x2KhPaUFUsFOGF6vzPnTgrUlnWfVcndoOblRdAlO6E CvBH5wYbolciXUH2Hp7glSi0peZTHNwY9cjVzZpUv8RRmIGPcx36r8glSYuysrlVCse6 nkYxIlMccVRqFW5rReW3E+TSlgspwD+YvxrHBDgLNHlYSprcENgHRtaO9xqzdwydIQxs x6YdxXLlszp4jVR4ZhQ+4XilumXwlBh1L5BcGsHboZRT830S9kwtULQ9w8Oak+EdC9YS laNH9+W/100gZsiK22DGYrh5F44NxK8TpFSbIMAF9+tvC4o0kxhRR65wSIPdqNciiKNl RSYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PHhTvJvlp282geyvnN6lqmtIre2JqU8zIfc24ooZxy8=; b=KoeWhGtBxfjfiiL1TAfBBVvj3rBykAbUoRr1o0w2OAoJOLG+r0i6cyzsaV6K3T25YC sVBn8S0cwkSSSk4OOFFw/QQ5zWXfTHjHmdEwRx44zs6W0VMnvdXgThLUoeNfvf5AhDD1 oKpXIp2GTMLd8BHlhMSfSdpMtOOdzKL/nFljGvIhLTjPtoCorUfhc6DiyxQjFEbX6+Sv RuW234DiS42rbB5nEYmd7Konk5fbT1Lg8capqewoo1cHDUWD3dVHl8wjEt9YAjEwLHDl 7ak0kJox84GOGlMOeoumvLMfnZysrhPklocJoZnKLC7HMYQohV4qBAEzclzD1DxP5htE ISuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ePMqMOm1YCP++cKdKvQi1M3jQkcXONP/2ehQBZr3/6IxGoGTb ptEzD6HWNbJMwathTecFqAc+RdLjEw2EqwrD9Ok=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKnIxDgNxdsM+JXpdxAmVN+X6vdyTrN0GGxIQdBfr+L0BpBluXybRy16geWY9g3KI8tOPwB2tL45eyHsT8KL0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1952:: with SMTP id e18mr4065184ilm.189.1602104936406; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Rob Sayre <>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:45 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Warren Kumari <>
Cc: The IESG <>, DNS Privacy Working Group <>,, Brian Haberman <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0a20d05b11b1f27"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 21:08:59 -0000

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:42 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker <> wrote:

> My DISCUS is specifically around the"The Alleged Public Nature of DNS
> Data" /
> "It has long been claimed that "the data in the DNS is public" section --
> it
> seems to be unnecessarily creating and then shooting down a strawman. The
> "the
> data in the DNS is public" aphorism talks is more about the
> confidentiality one
> can expect **publishing** data in the DNS, not the privacy of the lookups.

Some discussions I've seen have centered on the idea that resolver
selection in combination with DoH/DoT could lead to the exposure of private

I do not think this is an important issue, but some people clearly do.