Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 07 October 2020 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0810B3A13CC; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CRGainsUa4nh; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x141.google.com (mail-il1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A0A3A0F2E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x141.google.com with SMTP id q1so3725421ilt.6; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PHhTvJvlp282geyvnN6lqmtIre2JqU8zIfc24ooZxy8=; b=dtMTN40YTs3fi37iiNd/4zi1x2KhPaUFUsFOGF6vzPnTgrUlnWfVcndoOblRdAlO6E CvBH5wYbolciXUH2Hp7glSi0peZTHNwY9cjVzZpUv8RRmIGPcx36r8glSYuysrlVCse6 nkYxIlMccVRqFW5rReW3E+TSlgspwD+YvxrHBDgLNHlYSprcENgHRtaO9xqzdwydIQxs x6YdxXLlszp4jVR4ZhQ+4XilumXwlBh1L5BcGsHboZRT830S9kwtULQ9w8Oak+EdC9YS laNH9+W/100gZsiK22DGYrh5F44NxK8TpFSbIMAF9+tvC4o0kxhRR65wSIPdqNciiKNl RSYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PHhTvJvlp282geyvnN6lqmtIre2JqU8zIfc24ooZxy8=; b=KoeWhGtBxfjfiiL1TAfBBVvj3rBykAbUoRr1o0w2OAoJOLG+r0i6cyzsaV6K3T25YC sVBn8S0cwkSSSk4OOFFw/QQ5zWXfTHjHmdEwRx44zs6W0VMnvdXgThLUoeNfvf5AhDD1 oKpXIp2GTMLd8BHlhMSfSdpMtOOdzKL/nFljGvIhLTjPtoCorUfhc6DiyxQjFEbX6+Sv RuW234DiS42rbB5nEYmd7Konk5fbT1Lg8capqewoo1cHDUWD3dVHl8wjEt9YAjEwLHDl 7ak0kJox84GOGlMOeoumvLMfnZysrhPklocJoZnKLC7HMYQohV4qBAEzclzD1DxP5htE ISuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ePMqMOm1YCP++cKdKvQi1M3jQkcXONP/2ehQBZr3/6IxGoGTb ptEzD6HWNbJMwathTecFqAc+RdLjEw2EqwrD9Ok=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKnIxDgNxdsM+JXpdxAmVN+X6vdyTrN0GGxIQdBfr+L0BpBluXybRy16geWY9g3KI8tOPwB2tL45eyHsT8KL0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1952:: with SMTP id e18mr4065184ilm.189.1602104936406; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160193413191.28964.1483642169279931217@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160193413191.28964.1483642169279931217@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:08:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz2E3Stn0vmZecTO3+WBvo30JZWY=H6Y7wMfK_62KkJsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis@ietf.org, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0a20d05b11b1f27"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ljzd-N37XdgBOC7ugxFqOq8Cx4Q>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 21:08:59 -0000

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:42 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> My DISCUS is specifically around the"The Alleged Public Nature of DNS
> Data" /
> "It has long been claimed that "the data in the DNS is public" section --
> it
> seems to be unnecessarily creating and then shooting down a strawman. The
> "the
> data in the DNS is public" aphorism talks is more about the
> confidentiality one
> can expect **publishing** data in the DNS, not the privacy of the lookups.
>

Some discussions I've seen have centered on the idea that resolver
selection in combination with DoH/DoT could lead to the exposure of private
names.

I do not think this is an important issue, but some people clearly do.

thanks,
Rob