[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (7972)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 06 June 2024 02:37 UTC

To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240606023706.9A985C000063@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 19:37:06 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: QE7CUYAZBYSQNAAT5CCUAYLROJV2ITKI
CC: nate@natechoe.dev, roy.arends@telin.nl, sra@isc.org, mlarson@verisign.com, massey@cs.colostate.edu, scott.rose@nist.gov, dnsext@ietf.org
Precedence: list
Subject: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (7972)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/1PZ58ajXFj_RodKgHzus6d6UB-U>

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4035,
"Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7972

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Nate Choe <nate@natechoe.dev>

Section: 4.2

Original Text
-------------
   Security-aware resolvers MAY query for missing security RRs in an
   attempt to perform validation; implementations that choose to do so
   must be aware that the answers received may not be sufficient to
   validate the original response.  For example, a zone update may have
   changed (or deleted) the desired information between the original and
   follow-up queries.

Corrected Text
--------------
   Security-aware resolvers MAY query for missing security RRs in an
   attempt to perform validation; implementations that choose to do so
   MUST be aware that the answers received may not be sufficient to
   validate the original response.  For example, a zone update may have
   changed (or deleted) the desired information between the original and
   follow-up queries.

Notes
-----
"MUST" is a key word according to RFC 2119/BCP 14 and should be capitalized.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC4035 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-protocol-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions
Publication Date    : March 2005
Author(s)           : R. Arends, R. Austein, M. Larson, D. Massey, S. Rose
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : DNS Extensions
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Rob Austein
[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (797… RFC Errata System
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Ted Hardie
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … S Moonesamy
[dnsext] Re: dnsext[Editorial Errata Reported] RF… Wes Hardaker
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Rose, Scott W. (Fed)
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Olafur Gudmundsson
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Rebecca VanRheenen
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Rob Austein
[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)