IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 04 April 2012 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247A121F87E1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lamd3Fw6Y5Dl for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207FF21F848E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so607926lag.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tXDWQSnlsS7PcDsyIoKUxqC+lXA7S1mi9x4rFfYtFw8=; b=cH/gbyvaZ7OPmJki76T3M7uXRsCeNzDToF4auhrr5PNUqXtYEtP1Q3/OLAf0E9hjc6 lgZjfmoZRH0RlcAlrzrMKZNZSo1I4DWtL46pZdJbDaqB7mG3FFB/cXdH4nxeBl52rp2x uG8l+GzL6XdUxp8NqTnAWWlHdy6OMbdH0aiVc/CLA1e/+mXRmyC2gwCD/mVwNMg1Bpri rET/7cBvgbjSMf5EJtX4KyitU6X+wJWPT9DjKxiKaQmoYz10i98reKarzJYOcC6VNCYi XkzRgzg+8kEKgSYjiilSp86M0yynmcBGkH2xJm8NmSHgzeEsa4+cTB+fq3TiPKbRlPdJ sUxw==
Received: by 10.152.131.66 with SMTP id ok2mr19432994lab.10.1333555350945; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.21.162 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a06240802cba21852b697@10.31.200.143>
References: <a06240804cb99d889a11a@192.168.130.74> <a06240802cba21852b697@10.31.200.143>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:02:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEJN0CGBRhieHsLMrV7H_sOkHAp3qsp-foVVcYZkG2_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:02:33 -0000

I support making this a working group document and will review it.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> wrote:
> So far I have comments from three people added to the next version-to-be.
>
> Frankly, there isn't a lot to this document and it's based on observations.
>  I don't see it as being all that interesting or in need of much "work"
> despite the fact that inputs to date have improved the document.
>
> The answer I seek now is whether this comes in as a -00 in WG name or goes
> to a -02 version under a personal submission.  (I.e., window dressing.)
>
> All in all, the WG has shown a low amount of energy for this (rightly so)
> but when I tried independent submission I was told this is a matter for the
> WG to look at.  The old "catch-22" (see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_22).
>
> The IANA editor has informally expressed support for this as a way to clean
> up dangling references in the DNS parameters page.  This is the reason the
> document has resurfaced.
>
> So, WG or not?  Individual or not?  I just want to get this moving and done.
>
>
> At 11:17 +0200 3/29/12, Edward Lewis wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts on whether the following would be a DNSEXT document? I'm
>> asking DNSOP too.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis
> NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
>
> 2012...time to reuse those 1984 calendars!
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email