IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Thu, 29 March 2012 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C107421F8790 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 632zoifsp06z for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F7821F878A for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2TBlmLt098082; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:47:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [192.168.130.74] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:47:50 +0200
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:47:50 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240804cb99f7f194c4@[192.168.130.74]>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203291220380.3931@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <a06240804cb99d889a11a@[192.168.130.74]> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203291220380.3931@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:47:46 +0200
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:47:54 -0000

At 12:23 +0100 3/29/12, Tony Finch wrote:
>Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> wrote:
>
>>  Any thoughts on whether the following would be a DNSEXT document? I'm asking
>>  DNSOP too.
>>
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01
>
>Having gone through the IANA RR type registry recently, this is quite a
>useful document :-)
>
>There's a nit in section 2.0: there is no need to consider downcasing or
>compression, since RFCs 3597 and 4034 completely specify which RRs are
>subject to these modifications.

3597 and 4034 only mention if you have to do compression/down casing, 
not where in the RDATA the domain names appear.

I should have rephrased that as a question...I mean, given that, do 
you still think there's no need to mention?

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

2012...time to reuse those 1984 calendars!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email