Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A328121F84EC for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVITP9Q6HxLz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58F521F88F2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2TB74hJ097635 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:07:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4F744259.3000906@ogud.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:07:05 +0200
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <a06240804cb99d889a11a@[192.168.130.74]>
In-Reply-To: <a06240804cb99d889a11a@[192.168.130.74]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:07:07 -0000
On 29/03/2012 11:17, Edward Lewis wrote: > Any thoughts on whether the following would be a DNSEXT document? I'm > asking DNSOP too. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-01 > FWIW, this document is inside the WG scope, Consider this an official request for comments if there are people in this group willing to work on reviewing and assisting Ed in pushing this document out. Olafur
- [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] Want this to be a WG doc? David Conrad