Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 29 July 2009 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9651A3A6B6C; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ooQ4wdJsxc2; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95563A6E78; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MWBRd-000IvS-8F for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:51:57 +0000
Received: from [2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e] (helo=givry.fdupont.fr) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>) id 1MWBRY-000Iu6-WE for namedroppers@psg.com; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:51:55 +0000
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6TFpkTk060093; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:51:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200907291551.n6TFpkTk060093@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Michael Graff <mgraff@isc.org>
cc: namedroppers@psg.com
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:29:13 CDT. <4A703289.2030005@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:51:46 +0200
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
In your previous mail you wrote: The response would include an EDNS option specifying the tri-state (I know there is no record, I do not know if I have a record) for each type NOT returned in the answer section, so the client can decide if it should try harder if it really prefers one or the other option. => or a NSEC* RR showing one of the address RR type is not present (it works only with DNSSEC but is simple). Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Michael Graff