Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments
Michael Graff <mgraff@isc.org> Wed, 29 July 2009 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31AA3A6BE7; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.337, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IP_ADDR=1.119, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bqwZrIEAHZvd; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272063A6909; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MWBUJ-000JQB-4N for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:54:43 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:ba:203:47ff:fe6c:4a31] (helo=white.flame.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mgraff@isc.org>) id 1MWBSw-000J7M-MR for namedroppers@psg.com; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:53:38 +0000
Received: from white.flame.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F1327A76; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:53:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [130.129.23.145] (dhcp-1791.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54217327A6D; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:53:17 +0000 (UTC)
References: <200907291551.n6TFpkTk060093@givry.fdupont.fr>
Message-Id: <A35E0728-4C10-4EBF-92C6-5C093BA5A78F@isc.org>
From: Michael Graff <mgraff@isc.org>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200907291551.n6TFpkTk060093@givry.fdupont.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A341)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A341)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:53:11 +0200
Cc: "namedroppers@psg.com" <namedroppers@psg.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
And better if dnssec was used. I am concerd about the answer where an A is cached and AAAA is not. As a client I may want to know that. --Michael On Jul 29, 2009, at 17:51, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > The response would include an EDNS option specifying the tri-state > (I > know there is no record, I do not know if I have a record) for > each type > NOT returned in the answer section, so the client can decide if it > should try harder if it really prefers one or the other option. > > => or a NSEC* RR showing one of the address RR type is not present > (it works only with DNSSEC but is simple). > > Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Michael Graff
- Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 comments Michael Graff