Re: [DNSOP] Concerns around deployment of DNS over HTTPS (DoH)

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 25 March 2019 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165211204B8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R9DKqAu3fxYl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F7C1204AC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:36086) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1h8Q55-000fRD-Js (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:56:03 +0000
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:56:02 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <dacf9e04-bb65-63c5-5c1b-b6b9209be396@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903251355140.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CADWWn7UZj3oAfqpcpnAenGDpZHatrvQ=97OxAWX8c3881oevhA@mail.gmail.com> <ybl5zsaxmmr.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <ffc14e6e-5462-bdb2-0c80-336e5d311818@redbarn.org> <dacf9e04-bb65-63c5-5c1b-b6b9209be396@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-BFsS8jDlS9NxH4Zjo8qHne6R8o>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Concerns around deployment of DNS over HTTPS (DoH)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:56:13 -0000

nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> https works also without names it is just less common.

It's difficult to get a certificate for an IP address.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne: Northwest 5 or 6, backing west 4 or 5,
occasionally 7 at first in Forties. Rough, occasionally very rough at first in
Forties, becoming moderate. Fair. Good.