Re: [DNSOP] Obsoleting DLV

+1 to all of that which follows!

> On 2 Jul 2019, at 14:41, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
> 
>> So ISC plans to deprecate the feature in BIND 9.  But also I think it is
>> time to move the protocol to Historic status as a clear signal to
>> everyone that it should no longer be implemented or deployed.
> 
> I agree with moving DLV to historic. It is no longer needed at large,
> and while it can serve a few corner cases, the only public DLV registry
> has been deactivated years ago, and DLV is not universally implemented
> to begin with, so one could not depend on a new to be launched DLV registry
> anyways.
> 
> The draft seems to explain it well.
> 
>> Title:	  Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status
> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/
> 
> 	"As of May 2019, the root zone is signed"
> 
> While it is correct that in May 2019, the root zone is signed, I don't
> think that's the information you are trying to relay :) :) :)
> 
> 
> 3.1.1.2.  I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang
> 
>   The draft "YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record Types"
>   [I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang] refers to RFC 4431 to
>   describe the DLV entry in the YANG module iana-dns-class-rr-type.
>   This reference should be removed.
> 
> I think this does not need to be in this document, but the authors
> should be requested to remove it in an update to their document.
> In general, yang documents should not populate IANA registries, which
> is something I raised afew months ago and the yang community is looking
> at that. (and reference IANA registries instead)
> 
> And I think Ond&#345;ej  should fix up his name :)
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] Obsoleting DLV

Attachment: signature.asc