Re: [DNSOP] Obsoleting DLV

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Matthijs Mekking wrote:

> So ISC plans to deprecate the feature in BIND 9.  But also I think it is
> time to move the protocol to Historic status as a clear signal to
> everyone that it should no longer be implemented or deployed.

I agree with moving DLV to historic. It is no longer needed at large,
and while it can serve a few corner cases, the only public DLV registry
has been deactivated years ago, and DLV is not universally implemented
to begin with, so one could not depend on a new to be launched DLV registry
anyways.

The draft seems to explain it well.

> Title:	  Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status

>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/

 	"As of May 2019, the root zone is signed"

While it is correct that in May 2019, the root zone is signed, I don't
think that's the information you are trying to relay :) :) :)


3.1.1.2.  I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang

    The draft "YANG Types for DNS Classes and Resource Record Types"
    [I-D.lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang] refers to RFC 4431 to
    describe the DLV entry in the YANG module iana-dns-class-rr-type.
    This reference should be removed.

I think this does not need to be in this document, but the authors
should be requested to remove it in an update to their document.
In general, yang documents should not populate IANA registries, which
is something I raised afew months ago and the yang community is looking
at that. (and reference IANA registries instead)

And I think Ondřej  should fix up his name :)

Paul