IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-01.txt

"Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Wed, 26 October 2016 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695E51299F4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aO5ApHBdj7Ay for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F54129560 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from healthyao-PC (unknown [218.241.103.224]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0AZRom5DRBYDFEABw--.15100S2; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:58:17 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:58:18 +0800
From: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <11d1f4be.4df.157f6fc72c7.Coremail.yaojk@cnnic.cn>, <CA+nkc8AzZiV1_VqOOfE0b1D_5F8Mz8tErPDz2hnAzT6OYFs1Yw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2016102609581250388097@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart684175471622_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0AZRom5DRBYDFEABw--.15100S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW5KF1kJF47tr1DGF1rXr13Arb_yoWxXFbEkw 1kta1xJ3y5XF18uanrGa1rJry0qFW5CF1UAa1rJr409wn3Zrs8XFn5ur92ya4xXr4jy3sx KrnFv3sxtr9F9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb3kYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4 vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF 0I0E4I0vr24lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeV CFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxMxkI ecxEwVAFwVWkMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I 8CrVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUXVWU AwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x 0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr1j6rW3Jr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAF wI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCE64xvF2IEb7IF0Fy7YxBIda VFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07j138nUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5fBDL4HQX4Dd-VX7yg9UqWliWaQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:58:21 -0000

From: Bob Harold
Date: 2016-10-25 00:25
To: Jiankang Yao; IETF DNSOP WG
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-01.txt




> I like the concept.
>  

thanks.

> The AQ bit and count are probably unnecessary, the option length will determine the end of the options.
> 

will consider to remove it in the next version.


> But I don't understand how the length of each prefix is determined.  Can you explain?
> 


 It is same to normal domain names. 

it is terminated by a label with zero length.We will clarify it in the next version.


> Some minor spelling corrections:
> 

 thanks. 

 Jiankang Yao

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email