IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] More private algorithms for DNSSEC

Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> Thu, 24 March 2022 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pspacek@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17E03A17CF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=jhbO/deQ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=CsBWdvhV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fq1bu6zNEGDb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0F83A17C4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.1.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3E03AB007 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:28:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mx.pao1.isc.org AA3E03AB007
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1648117681; bh=bmHS2sksvgtiUcKQ90Zue7W/f4K4hE4ITEMKaRfUAS8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=jhbO/deQmm3+EpSjLtuENtrNyGeJqp58iDHQWwM3pG0p+FYvdhM0AdN57W3mx1ruu Lbaenc17jwuJZTeVi4grVz5QZVqSrY26YN0YVOMkaeDtu2M5q08gJSYbKlRNWXsHH5 jAoZ7d9xE7K/U07o16sL3280PIIISaau/2tAjAQc=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD69110296E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8124F1102973 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org 8124F1102973
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1648117637; bh=bmHS2sksvgtiUcKQ90Zue7W/f4K4hE4ITEMKaRfUAS8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=CsBWdvhV2aZ0w2qej+ozthX/1/RybpyNyi5q5z4TVHGKFx7JXU3yvDffERbS+xLeW tfvhV2stytoJnVGznCuX81mCzZtX7Lxmcav8QAT97QzU+1F/JC/7IHwxOMtezFqxrN nL+RFRYK8L7KUOCrZEQaoGP2N1NLCeIVCBmnbTdg=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pQOBEYM_V86v for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [31.133.129.211] (dhcp-81d3.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.129.211]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 069F0110296E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:27:16 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <11312c08-aec9-b40d-3211-e5f190401cc3@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:27:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <5C105C71-B18C-4366-94F5-E8D60970109C@icann.org> <20B389EF-4909-43A0-9BC8-F57F5E332E8A@verisign.com> <1D59C3FB-4FCC-4A03-8E13-EA6902B14D2A@icann.org> <54622bd0dd3253187a9c9b69d0a1188a4d898bd9.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <54622bd0dd3253187a9c9b69d0a1188a4d898bd9.camel@powerdns.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8_VizZwtwYuY8lv8O81FqQU6RIw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More private algorithms for DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:28:08 -0000

On 23. 03. 22 10:45, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> So, Paul, I support the idea behind your draft, but not the current
> wording. While more 253-like points might be somewhat useful, what we
> really need are experimental code points with non-253 semantics.
I agree. IMHO experiment codepoint which does not get any special 
treatment would be good enough.

-- 
Petr Špaček

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email