Re: [DNSOP] More private algorithms for DNSSEC

[Paul Wouters <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2022, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Greetings again. I have created a new, very short draft to add more private use algorithms to DNSSEC.
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-more-private-algs/
> The abstract says:
>   RFC 4034 allocates one value in the IANA registry for DNSSEC
>   algorithm numbers for private algorithms.  That may be too few for
>   experimentation where multiple yet-to-be-assigned algorithms are
>   used.  This document assigns seven more values for this use case.
>
> That's about it. This is quite low priority for now, but might become more important as people start to experiment with multiple pre-standard post-quantum algorithms at the same time.

I agree with the draft that this is a good idea and will become a
requirement in the near future.

I would like to see some more clarity in the IANA Considerations
section that just lists the value there and the values requested,
with a link to the actual Registry discussed.

Paul