IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] About key tags

"libor.peltan" <libor.peltan@nic.cz> Wed, 28 February 2024 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <libor.peltan@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42854C14F68A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:52:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ox_Wgg4jTe-8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05517C14F5EA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:52:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:1488:fffe:6:95e9:b221:d739:7cec] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:95e9:b221:d739:7cec]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A18441C1171; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:52:49 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mail.nic.cz; auth=pass smtp.auth=libor.peltan@nic.cz smtp.mailfrom=libor.peltan@nic.cz
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1709121169; bh=3KRjyBFz+/fNOJ4JVlkauRq+9L/9SvwvI88PLVOKNxg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To: Subject:To:Cc; b=ZAXRpqOS1IoO6b00oxDlXhA6dX1q1g/L5EjghHMH04bLhXk1Tf4hNwue216IV1YIl +V7uM4Wl9O5WQteiGPsRdw2Zv0RWxzBZSO2og7rY+oK7n+HeJqKtYjTYAPGl5OrKIT iA9nPCMizA++L9xjm9wchDDjzHBLwP2YkLEoumAQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DqMFCbZgYR8jJp88YeviF0Eb"
Message-ID: <0dbcd653-878e-4726-9a89-56655f8365eb@nic.cz>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:52:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: peter@desec.io
References: <20240227202409.70647840DF26@ary.qy>
From: "libor.peltan" <libor.peltan@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20240227202409.70647840DF26@ary.qy>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Rspamd-Action: no action
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=multimap; Matched map: WHITELISTED_IP
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A18441C1171
X-Spamd-Bar: /
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 20.00]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25192, ipnet:2001:1488::/32, country:CZ]; WHITELISTED_IP(0.00)[2001:1488:fffe:6:95e9:b221:d739:7cec]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]
X-Rspamd-Server: mail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9AT203t0LxVm3Tj9u09rxypAZNY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] About key tags
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:52:57 -0000

Hi John,

Dne 27. 02. 24 v 21:24 John Levine napsal(a):
> The total number of domains where I found duplicate tags was 105.
>
As I said earlier, is while I appreciate such research, I warn against 
misinterpreting it. The main point isn't about the zones that are 
currently experiencing a keytag-conflict; it's about the zones where 
there is a potential threat that they might do tomorrow (considering the 
case when many mainstream validating resolvers would start enforcing 
strong keytag-conflict-intolerance).

Libor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email