IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Nothing more useful to say About key tags

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 04 March 2024 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F361C151525 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="DUMvAsJ+"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="H5+X2vJr"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFhWiY9Va8Uo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AFBC151095 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 46689 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2024 19:41:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b65d65e623eb.k2403; bh=3YgtqvowhQEvmmLBtkdDeOI1Csqxf1xahH/fxheK48Q=; b=DUMvAsJ+2WzjCAlAslLmvuJNfGM9A5/DHcBwkF6kW3bhZrjvp4Poc5D9H8/aigvat+kT30vEdOOE7bo0lWyWhBKIAydGhp17B2zHFP+Gj8IaUm1kxuRz4Ndl+RkmzDBiJvPNNL4ohefNpa/0bb3CIrVdYTXDqlsxkw5bF0ZQmopn3gLZiqdhuv2KfMn/e8qLO/Y0avYLtWUxPYLdPhGfvfYmZjyDOpULaiQx8HBoEgEhOmqoRErCYNn7Dp3FFO0dt1Rwcv6ySMM7SdJZRxfN+VKb8RdeJSiRoWC5lXEg12m7xrQx71yv0sEI2u8tUf4zQMb/Wa8Ega/ZpYKwM1E0rw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b65d65e623eb.k2403; bh=3YgtqvowhQEvmmLBtkdDeOI1Csqxf1xahH/fxheK48Q=; b=H5+X2vJroL0mtSVtgsXWLwn2xmLXpgX6kwcsyUYdnBagah87HD38iN40u9rbBB5t/8aXUbWwE/+KRr3OrB/Yydr5822O1HfJZK9B2BbGP3vYA+spjEHNc78AgA+H8R7OfjAPgdrfV+6XRAfBmPPzaK7foR0a9L31Z87MFBgv04UToChx5+aknaS6eh9+J0LgoZVygTuyUqyNvUyFaKTrQ24Uz28RldTVNVP05ZXi+p6dtXEKKf1qasRbu8jnh8ZWVtuly2RaVNP6mgQXnVPVnbrihkotkMtr7pXNDkdbTGcuD8XPF/i/DTMVjH9snOb+J+sGpRUNqT0EstYMBzgb5w==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 04 Mar 2024 19:41:30 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E7051846070B; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:41:29 -0400 (AST)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:41:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20240304194129.E7051846070B@ary.local>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: pch-dnsop-5@u-1.phicoh.com
In-Reply-To: <m1rhDok-0000LSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9kOikJbYn9IVh1adSP58px5Wpf8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Nothing more useful to say About key tags
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:41:38 -0000

It appears that Philip Homburg  <pch-dnsop-5@u-1.phicoh.com> said:
>>Not at all. This would be an incompatible change that breaks existing
>>working DNS configurations, for at most a trivial simplification in
>>load limiting code many years from now, even assuming people were to
>>implement it.
>
>Opinions difference how much this change will help.
>
>The point I wanted to make is that this change does not lead to issues at
>level of DNSSEC standard protocols.

But that point is completely wrong.  What you propose is a breaking change.  It
is incompatible with existing DNS standards.  So, no.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email