[DNSOP] second call ... rough draft of the minutes (ietf 71)

[Edward Lewis <[e-mail]>]

Aww, I didn't do *that* great of a job taking notes, did I?  I mean, 
if you complain enough I won't be asked to do this again.

At 13:36 -0400 3/26/08, Edward Lewis wrote:
>Comments?
>
>DNSOP WG Minutes
>IETF 71 @ Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
>March 11, 2008
>
>1. WG Administration notes
>
>RFC 5138 "6to4 Reverse DNS" published
>Draft "reflectors are evil" faces two DISCUSSes in IESG
>Draft "default local zones" is in or past WG last call
>
>2. Charter Revision Proposal
>
>@Mic comments:
>
>On mention of benchmarking
>Stephane B: isn't benchmarking the domain of another WG?
>Ralph Bonica: (Area Director) says, talk with Al [NM]orton of BMWG
>
>On omission of specific DNS systems
>General comment: group never had oversight role on any system, mentions
>in the previous charter were for illustration
>Andrew Sullivan: Proposed charter never mentions "operation of DNS."
>Hum on adding something on "operation of DNS" - some support
>
>Milestones - need updating
>
>3. Discussions of active drafts
>
>Promises to review:
>
>Reverse Map Considerations: Olafur, Jaap, Liman, Olaf, Jinmei
>AS112-ops and -attack: Andrew Sullivan, Brian Dickson, Jaap, 
>Stephane B, Mark A
>Response Size: Matt Larson, David Blacka, Brian D, Olafur, Eric Nelson
>DNSSEC trust anchor: Scott Rose, Olaf, John Dickinson, Sam, Matt (the guy
>who won the hockey tickets), Joe G, David Blacka, Russ Mundy
>Resolver priming - currently expired
>
>General comment (which was unclear to me the minute taker)
>Brian Dickson: General operations of resolvers, is there any need for meta-
>priming, bootstrap for DNS resolver configuration, should WG have default
>config's for implementers?
>From [e-mail]  Thu Apr  3 08:11:38 2008
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
X-Original-To: [e-mail]
Delivered-To: [e-mail]
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB193A6CF2;
	Thu,  3 Apr 2008 08:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: [e-mail]
Delivered-To: [e-mail]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12573A687D
	for <[e-mail]>; Thu,  3 Apr 2008 08:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.148
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, BODY_ENHANCEMENT2=0.001,
	J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 433cBt3cjfGd for <[e-mail]>;
	Thu,  3 Apr 2008 08:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ogud.com (hlid.ogud.com [66.92.146.160])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADBF3A6C9B
	for <[e-mail]>; Thu,  3 Apr 2008 08:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (ns.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6])
	by ogud.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m33FBVIU022610;
	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:11:31 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from [e-mail])
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240805c41aa13e7604@[0.0.0.0]>
In-Reply-To: <a06240801c4103852a3d7@[0.0.0.0]>
References: <a06240801c4103852a3d7@[0.0.0.0]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:00:42 -0400
To: [e-mail]
From: Edward Lewis <[e-mail]>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 10.20.30.6
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [DNSOP] second call ...  rough draft of the minutes (ietf 71)
X-BeenThere: [e-mail]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
	<mailto:[e-mail]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:[e-mail]>
List-Help: <mailto:[e-mail]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
	<mailto:[e-mail]?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [e-mail]
Errors-To: [e-mail]

Aww, I didn't do *that* great of a job taking notes, did I?  I mean, 
if you complain enough I won't be asked to do this again.

At 13:36 -0400 3/26/08, Edward Lewis wrote:
>Comments?
>
>DNSOP WG Minutes
>IETF 71 @ Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
>March 11, 2008
>
>1. WG Administration notes
>
>RFC 5138 "6to4 Reverse DNS" published
>Draft "reflectors are evil" faces two DISCUSSes in IESG
>Draft "default local zones" is in or past WG last call
>
>2. Charter Revision Proposal
>
>@Mic comments:
>
>On mention of benchmarking
>Stephane B: isn't benchmarking the domain of another WG?
>Ralph Bonica: (Area Director) says, talk with Al [NM]orton of BMWG
>
>On omission of specific DNS systems
>General comment: group never had oversight role on any system, mentions
>in the previous charter were for illustration
>Andrew Sullivan: Proposed charter never mentions "operation of DNS."
>Hum on adding something on "operation of DNS" - some support
>
>Milestones - need updating
>
>3. Discussions of active drafts
>
>Promises to review:
>
>Reverse Map Considerations: Olafur, Jaap, Liman, Olaf, Jinmei
>AS112-ops and -attack: Andrew Sullivan, Brian Dickson, Jaap, 
>Stephane B, Mark A
>Response Size: Matt Larson, David Blacka, Brian D, Olafur, Eric Nelson
>DNSSEC trust anchor: Scott Rose, Olaf, John Dickinson, Sam, Matt (the guy
>who won the hockey tickets), Joe G, David Blacka, Russ Mundy
>Resolver priming - currently expired
>
>General comment (which was unclear to me the minute taker)
>Brian Dickson: General operations of resolvers, is there any need for meta-
>priming, bootstrap for DNS resolver configuration, should WG have default
>config's for implementers?
>
>Akira Kato - latest version of Response Size is -10
>Stephane B - version -10 is okay
>About 5 have read the -10 version
>
>5 documents to go to staggered last calls
>
>Other Drafts
>
>Key Rollover State Terminology - Olafur G and Johan Ihren
>-00 individual submission
>draft-gudmundsson-life-of-dnskey-00.txt
>
>Unification of terminology needed
>   generated->published->used/active->retired->removed (and revoked)
>8 or 9 state definitions
>headed for informational track
>
>John Dickinson: what about signature state terms?
>Answer: no, what do you want?
>
>Sam Weiler: is this a partial rewrite of the spec?
>Chair: ?
>Terms are not precise enough (now).
>Sam: Not sure this document is a good starting point.
>
>Hum: adopt/use doc loud, do not use doc, low, use something else - silence
>(Scribe's Note: I cannot detect silence too well, bad hearing and all)
>
>Design team current topic: Nameserver Control Protocol (presenter Jaap)
>
>4 IETF's ago - protocol for this going nowhere
>2 IETF's ago - design team wish list
>little happening now - unfinished, rough document
>What to do - design team.  Ideas but no commitment.
>
>Other WGs
>
>DNSEXT - Cookies proposal (message authentication)
>v6ops - NAT PT
>ENUM - EDNS 0
>
>NAT-PT - rewrite DNS packets on the fly
>Kurtis Lindquist: v6ops co-chair, new translation thru NAT-PT
>Kim from Apple: DNS-ALG is not wanted
>Kurtis Lindquist: requirements gathering is currently on-going
>Ed Lewis: does this include "totd"?
>Answer: yes
>Mark A: detailed commentary about DNSSEC and totd
>
>ENUM - EDNS0
>Olafur Gudmundsson: DNSEXT is revising EDNS0 definition now
>
>Alex Mayerhofer - ENUM working group
>ENUM services guide, new version.  Covers service registration.  Needs words
>on DNS.
>
>Other WGs
>Brian Dickson - Routing Research Group generating new RR types
>Stephane B - 2nd Meeting on Friday morning, DNS-based mapping
>
>--
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Edward Lewis                                                [phone]
>NeuStar
>
>Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                [phone]
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



>Akira Kato - latest version of Response Size is -10
>Stephane B - version -10 is okay
>About 5 have read the -10 version
>
>5 documents to go to staggered last calls
>
>Other Drafts
>
>Key Rollover State Terminology - Olafur G and Johan Ihren
>-00 individual submission
>draft-gudmundsson-life-of-dnskey-00.txt
>
>Unification of terminology needed
>   generated->published->used/active->retired->removed (and revoked)
>8 or 9 state definitions
>headed for informational track
>
>John Dickinson: what about signature state terms?
>Answer: no, what do you want?
>
>Sam Weiler: is this a partial rewrite of the spec?
>Chair: ?
>Terms are not precise enough (now).
>Sam: Not sure this document is a good starting point.
>
>Hum: adopt/use doc loud, do not use doc, low, use something else - silence
>(Scribe's Note: I cannot detect silence too well, bad hearing and all)
>
>Design team current topic: Nameserver Control Protocol (presenter Jaap)
>
>4 IETF's ago - protocol for this going nowhere
>2 IETF's ago - design team wish list
>little happening now - unfinished, rough document
>What to do - design team.  Ideas but no commitment.
>
>Other WGs
>
>DNSEXT - Cookies proposal (message authentication)
>v6ops - NAT PT
>ENUM - EDNS 0
>
>NAT-PT - rewrite DNS packets on the fly
>Kurtis Lindquist: v6ops co-chair, new translation thru NAT-PT
>Kim from Apple: DNS-ALG is not wanted
>Kurtis Lindquist: requirements gathering is currently on-going
>Ed Lewis: does this include "totd"?
>Answer: yes
>Mark A: detailed commentary about DNSSEC and totd
>
>ENUM - EDNS0
>Olafur Gudmundsson: DNSEXT is revising EDNS0 definition now
>
>Alex Mayerhofer - ENUM working group
>ENUM services guide, new version.  Covers service registration.  Needs words
>on DNS.
>
>Other WGs
>Brian Dickson - Routing Research Group generating new RR types
>Stephane B - 2nd Meeting on Friday morning, DNS-based mapping
>
>--
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Edward Lewis                                                [phone]
>NeuStar
>
>Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                [phone]
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop