IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 13 January 2021 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835C73A1301; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzeT5Luemo1V; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224873A1300; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id d13so3476135ioy.4; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xTiK7rs1PYgUzfuLUY1LVh6Ntlf1q5VR1+8rzH9raVo=; b=l/UzPUHIYruToa0CwchGkyO+i4BFWqOMTjLBqMBRQTLapWJ+y9H59D6TkGKfOHtE3x jc71FQMC6ByMdC8qH5KG2e3BWUr3HylXXan6Z9tql9jmy7cFlTOXaHvee8KiIQXwF+Cd FoYMtzcr70X7DHEVGbAkVMelYp4oSKLRyWb0Xl/hIjUIqDftnOg80WUUJXzWpD56h5Ah 8BFdA5SIjNROVbIAZyjTGWERZswBH+cgDnGsyMmDw2ksRPzra0W7HFSBVV0/5ZX1mVYZ sPTS0YVTwOo9ah+XAqZT/Mi31Rgv8aih0dK8bFoYAuWFrwtOYhTJhCTJ71nGcddc91/6 U2ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xTiK7rs1PYgUzfuLUY1LVh6Ntlf1q5VR1+8rzH9raVo=; b=TWGArzWsuSYousvA8vn0RtQk7peSmUHFmEK10N5YEmm8HmPqhqunZH2jZX2rYR6bDj 4+n8hfJnZqVnPoeVMhCLgmVUVOaMRkVbg/0UttUbHePeviZRhwPqF5LC8mElg6mnmdBr /Stop2tS0AN1AxRmWJ1CUhrYvHN0H+7owk7dSGQTATezXy6QsweJgygsq2rqOcTK3Ti3 VfBgYqz8uUZeRHHnieL+Gj8WHJXBSF+baMWSgoSNmN8nB0wZqqNpVDlN3r8SXYvXW/Gx vdV7DqpvUBhUI2vTSKr4SgcGvIcsVl/JZS+cMYDamBGWJ/EontzcoqKY/1QDBQUwaRCz hWpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LL1iDVmdE8xpzPRwk5FXDVWnUZgdD0WIgMlTRVLdx7fmHl+no JJ9GzI0ffGuZgpxZJKOiL6vXSLU5iDZux/nkmDOFvkZED9Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydwq8H4BNqlO3dnBCKjT/pYpIp+ZWA24qGDs0pWFZAjJmitOZQ+cWcLgPZS6qjhlTM+9aN6R+6zBhjTqmm+JU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce8f:: with SMTP id r15mr2844331ilo.303.1610568677458; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160814495642.31798.14183403949248148049@ietfa.amsl.com> <599bde75-13a9-01a7-84b4-47608e9fecdd@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <599bde75-13a9-01a7-84b4-47608e9fecdd@nlnetlabs.nl>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxQFKGLTKRDuXqkxf6PecnVHM=tqeBmaXd-uky+fy93J=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e80b3d05b8cdbd83"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/A2nAoYD2AlpWDj9AvI--SMheSd0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:11:20 -0000

Fair enough, thanks.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:56 AM Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:

> Op 16-12-2020 om 19:55 schreef Martin Duke via Datatracker:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > It seems to me the mechanisms in Section 5 would be simplified by using
> some
> > the reserved bit to have an identifier for the secret.
>
> Thanks Martin for the suggestion,
>
> We actually considered this idea ourselves in an early stage of the
> document, but have rejected it, because it would require the identifier
> to be derived from the Server Secret somehow so that all servers in the
> anycast set associate the id with the same secret. Also, there is almost
> always just 1 Server Secret. Only when a Server Secret is updated (which
> should takes a limited amount of time), using an identifier for the
> Server Secret would be slightly more efficient.
>
> Cheers,
> -- Willem
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email