IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Collision Free Key Tags for DNSSEC draft

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 07 October 2025 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E1F6E526D5 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.017, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="M3mVyLYm"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="SFwUACMK"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G07jyHGi-1GN for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 18:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949A66E526C9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 18:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32374 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2025 01:15:57 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7e7468e469cd.k2510; t=1759799747; x=1760145347; bh=qtW2msR+Gpuhjy88n+LACrTC6vRjaeles6fdFITFvZk=; b=M3mVyLYm+hfcw3NxOONf2fYGass/5a1nTH8cf7T9oTGbZfx3oSnyPVq6W8yvoOmhUd9tvm6Lhc3qH1vXthaA4Q2yf3f1D7o9/6Enetv6+LzXr9rTBeg3vQotEvSNkUrQ7m2uxWl+bAt42LVQgIC/ZjCnc95IMhPiP2E94Z2mJQ5oLkiviyn1bbXlRrmFdIs83djzzyQOAC20Qn+njD0F+BhYabBJGaDACDw5DB1rXgn9IufkLzLc4KUV07YVPqS8cDGCylcTI6ecIgu7bnMXjgLDKnnfpFJTTHAKLXSZqtpRmqzZDXGhhQpgV5Rn6YjA3pZCYNZYfAEu2Oc6PHklYQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7e7468e469cd.k2510; bh=qtW2msR+Gpuhjy88n+LACrTC6vRjaeles6fdFITFvZk=; b=SFwUACMKWO/LTlowGoddkMNT5mqcLlt494q2sZPwzrSgoYxK0MhAzsia4xOrznOTuHPHHL5tcKd203VWMTfMxiG3ZnaJIlFj4sANtnPQ2Nm7LVZxZrz/7Xuy3llA9PM6B0sk+6iGWHW/aki2zDkX8ShIVNwD0M4bagJKrVujQVr1aggtP/lcABWpSrKSAXNC8NFqc+4whzx9MNfrfl5LEwStIJFTQJRYPJLDPQpHK1XASebVl60IiH+AnBLL2xHaS8MxymLV8EU21qEM5FVff6gJWwSqyMIVeVvB370scOEIdt3VOYB+dbA4/xNS5q126myqb3Mr11lcAauFhP7GAA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 07 Oct 2025 01:15:57 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B6F7DE029BCE; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 21:15:56 -0400
Message-Id: <20251007011556.B6F7DE029BCE@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <EB0DA1CD-F56E-4613-A98A-66CBFA625A6F@sury.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <D48EDF62-3F16-4B4B-B73D-5F345527ACA4@sury.org> <D3A20344-C1C0-4B19-A210-340662421966@nohats.ca> <m1v4E0u-0000M9C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20251002193113.15620DF7E96F@ary.qy> <m1v4bPP-0000MTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20251003172008.AAC59DFA2530@ary.qy> <EB0DA1CD-F56E-4613-A98A-66CBFA625A6F@sury.org>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: 5XA5Y2LRGDT2UGCGNHQKBJBT6ILIPQC2
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5XA5Y2LRGDT2UGCGNHQKBJBT6ILIPQC2
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ondrej@sury.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Collision Free Key Tags for DNSSEC draft
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DSe15jxTCGrA-__ax7nAmUQkIMc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that OndŠej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>No we are not the Network Police. But we do provide protocol definition
>and protocol guidance all the time. I'm with Phillip on this one that documenting
>this and providing a guidance would be a good thing. 

I would be quite happy to see an informational document that describes the reasons
that a validator should limit the number of keys and signatures it checks.  Maybe
even a BCP.

But for reasons already argued to death, I would be utterly opposed to a document
that purported to mandate that number to be 1.

R's,
John

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status