Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and a possible solution

Hi,

Obviously I'm interested in this work as well. 

If chairs approve, I would like to present the draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection at dnsop's IETF#78 meeting. As a starting point for this discussion, or separately.

Teemu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: 15. kesäkuuta 2010 16:24
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and
> a possible solution
> 
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:11:26AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> > The DNSOP group has considered but never adopted a draft (nor any
> > documented promoted to RFC) that defined what split DNS is.  Without
> a
> 
> If you were referring to draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view
> there, I'm not sure I agree.  My complaint at the time was that the
> document was trying to do two things at once, and neither was really
> fully there.  In particular, I thought (and still think) that a fairly
> extensive discussion of split-view was needed, and that the different
> approaches and so on needed to be enumerated in one document.  Then a
> second document detailing when and how to do split-view with DNSSEC
> (with that draft as the basis) would be good.  I was ready to work on
> this, and in fact I did some work on it, but there didn't seem to be
> much other enthusiasm.
> 
> I am still ready and willing to take this on.  I know that it's
> fashionable to go "lalalala" every time split-brain^H^H^H^H^Hview
> comes up, but it's a widely-used feature and I think we're remiss if
> we don't document it.  If you and Suresh want to continue work on
> this, so do I.
> 
> > The group has to define split DNS.
> 
> Completely agree.
> 
> A
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop