Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and a possible solution

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Tue, 15 June 2010 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F2E3A6A75 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.037
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.036, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eg+Ynqkds73X for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF223A6900 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F2CC1ECB41F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:24:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:24:26 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20100615132425.GC75154@shinkuro.com>
References: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F5A67233DE4@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <a06240801c83d2280a24e@[10.1.101.141]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a06240801c83d2280a24e@[10.1.101.141]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and a possible solution
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:24:25 -0000

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:11:26AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> The DNSOP group has considered but never adopted a draft (nor any  
> documented promoted to RFC) that defined what split DNS is.  Without a 

If you were referring to draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view
there, I'm not sure I agree.  My complaint at the time was that the
document was trying to do two things at once, and neither was really
fully there.  In particular, I thought (and still think) that a fairly
extensive discussion of split-view was needed, and that the different
approaches and so on needed to be enumerated in one document.  Then a
second document detailing when and how to do split-view with DNSSEC
(with that draft as the basis) would be good.  I was ready to work on
this, and in fact I did some work on it, but there didn't seem to be
much other enthusiasm.

I am still ready and willing to take this on.  I know that it's
fashionable to go "lalalala" every time split-brain^H^H^H^H^Hview
comes up, but it's a widely-used feature and I think we're remiss if
we don't document it.  If you and Suresh want to continue work on
this, so do I.

> The group has to define split DNS.

Completely agree.

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.