IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and a possible solution

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Tue, 15 June 2010 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A363A693E for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.19
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.189, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLWie9n0jPq7 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1EF3A6828 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (gatt.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5FDBTbu022740; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:11:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.1.101.141] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:11:36 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:11:36 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240801c83d2280a24e@[10.1.101.141]>
In-Reply-To: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F5A67233DE4@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F5A67233DE4@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:11:26 -0400
To: dnsop@ietf.org, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Split DNS problems for multi-interfaced hosts and a possible solution
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:11:36 -0000

At 14:22 +0200 6/15/10, <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com> wrote:
>Peter asked me to solicit this group for opinions and thoughts.

A comment independent of your (Teemu's) effort.

The DNSOP group has considered but never adopted a draft (nor any 
documented promoted to RFC) that defined what split DNS is.  Without 
a definition of split DNS, commenting on its complications for 
multi-homed devices will probably cause rat holing.

The group has to define split DNS.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view/
(Last update more than three years ago.)

>
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection/

As I haven't read the above document and although I do have a sketchy 
appreciation of the issue, I'll withhold any comments on said (unread 
by me) document until I can get the time.  It looks interesting.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Discussing IPv4 address policy is like deciding what to eat on the Titanic.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email