IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 October 2021 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB553A044D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOCnyrrWvfuE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC0F3A040B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id b20so14668067lfv.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gjz+Czx9xVrzYFhzXbzueHUljSHNU22I+4OaDMSDI5c=; b=kZB2jLjeVnYks4yGdsQbLcGrO+GHKEEK5DrHMssxL8iKo24s6dmyB1pV/Z6QBdaGu1 n5V3CL43v8hSQ7DjTQdaZ8io3XpYE3cEWGJTIMBigxdIPLPdm+7rqqQ6V9Dp5/E0MyLw TRMHr7YZmEh55+gi7MROmZzNWU0o8WhZb0BPCTMPp+eoPaJbvyCJf4VYLRgy5ZfhKMz6 S4n9HRbips6u1/YmWfDbm/nbKBPGESTBD3x9ldZBzGe4gtKLySnXgq4r0AQt+sLvuh4H EyrHJfY5hQCKFXB2JwJfpIR0ApgUxr3kHfQDQwgGNPkzSnjOJ3QxwbZ4P6NgzF2BNwl6 NjVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gjz+Czx9xVrzYFhzXbzueHUljSHNU22I+4OaDMSDI5c=; b=mWl8/3gbn6NjGf/RmpYrEqqwp+FgloUNjuzaJcA2tMpyEMxHgNIj7/+xC8NoYuO/Mz 9ns3YY6/ySB+klH8oqQX2iy+L1oFR9iWTSTMhV+OPuJViLT4UdMQq4WhQLsM+3jSMvwU /m45g63PbMKyZj8W20pHhq4cFXJaqqSvIi4IC652RNyHfoX05CQ3MiNa2nSCsVg0jwaH W9FNg1U8aCmC/uEI5kQetLst14fY3Ur1qvFCnZtAJUkFdpkireNX7/h7T6ShUzRZHZv2 kbnECL+xlL4FMYIeAMH9niIPMHTPv8KsansEyQqxl8etKiB2oxkQbZRZ996c/sq2ldry 921w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EgAFX5mIAkkw4anUKj/gUiOKCKwMAe1XcMFDkdmopzG2CJiz6 zZp4v+Y6Zugwqs5zgyugthrdPceiTJvi78oRbd5514FFulI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyerA5Ja9By00ZH7yhFBtdE+0Ccgzn4IhsUDnuf8wyqPZIgs+lga+srLUnqiwNq41R4KL9CCnPjGr/cQWSYwuQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39ca:: with SMTP id k10mr10972068lfu.571.1633545908395; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B08E9361-B97B-4862-861C-4EF628C85E50@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <B08E9361-B97B-4862-861C-4EF628C85E50@icann.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:44:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FL49V4LuGH3YUF+YkMPNVyFu8vukAjX5Qn_cN4ySwuDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098218f05cdb38bb8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Fj4EMB3Z3tFOdFOSG-jtnDakrpM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 18:45:16 -0000

Paul,

Thanks for bringing this up.  I feel this topic is also relevant to
the draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional draft currently being worked on.
While I am sure folks are aware of this,
this is more of a note that having the definitions clarified will help us
move this other draft forward.

thanks
tim

(and Tony - always thanks!)

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:23 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. I think that all of the issues from the WG on
> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis have been dealt with, except one significant
> one. Almost a year ago, Tony Finch started a thread about 8499's
> definitions of bailiwick and sibling glue. The thread is
>    <
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5bKXkqzCyGE1NuUko9M6wXLD5bI/>
>    <
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fAopdUTnVS2mDF71eiGsRdu9zco/>
>    <
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PqH_WMhsP5zxRfjKD4gtmf6nw54/>
>
> The WG should come to agreement on this so that we can close out the
> document. Please read these messages and comment here about changes you do
> or don't want to be made to the current draft.
>
> --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email