IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 12 October 2021 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5880E3A0896 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNtNc4P8b7Mb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF4D3A0891 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: https://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from [87.74.217.245] (port=63622 helo=milebook.lan) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:fanf2) (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1maGG3-0004AW-m8 (Exim 4.95) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:47:47 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:47:42 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <bb61304c-6ef9-7850-3dbb-19b624bc07b@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <60a11d97-8be4-91e-4880-999c1a57a75b@dotat.at>
References: <B08E9361-B97B-4862-861C-4EF628C85E50@icann.org> <bb61304c-6ef9-7850-3dbb-19b624bc07b@nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qNl87D4debFsV9np9yZxYXhGmZM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:48:02 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> As a seperate problem in the 2nd references email, I agree that the
> term "in-bailiwick" probably changed meaning from "within this
> delegation or below" to "the data related to this delegation".

I view the term "in-bailiwick" as no longer suitable for use in careful
writing because its meaning has become thorougly confused and muddled.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  https://dotat.at/
Dover, Wight: Northwest 3 or 4 veering north or northeast 4 to 6,
becoming variable 3 or less later. Smooth or slight, occasionally
moderate at first in north Dover. Showers. Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email