IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Wed, 20 October 2021 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B587D3A097F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 03:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3ApHk2wZqyd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 03:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1F13A1194 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 03:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:1488:fffe:6:c6d9:ca56:39d6:2b9a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:c6d9:ca56:39d6:2b9a]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2A3013FFD3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1634725314; bh=wSQcyy20hN0h40n3o+UrPvQK5W/00kk5hoGwI0b17jM=; h=Date:To:From; b=Wfp9GFQOTsOFjCNlFC0+MhL9uJu+OiSj8ko0PpXxNlSHT3+nyhMb08zeAYw07DCPu 4+86H8qp1wP26XQ7IVnd9XH9PKh+bNfMDbwBR2IWBQsErYucWYKb6c2S3ydrLaBPYM wN1UyHNPQEX7lcnNap5JHUQtWJrN6VWLQsgNNpoc=
Message-ID: <71ee4742-db93-712d-ac3f-6dac57fd8e32@nic.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:21:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <B08E9361-B97B-4862-861C-4EF628C85E50@icann.org> <bb61304c-6ef9-7850-3dbb-19b624bc07b@nohats.ca> <60a11d97-8be4-91e-4880-999c1a57a75b@dotat.at>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <60a11d97-8be4-91e-4880-999c1a57a75b@dotat.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zQb_cJ9TnaIWsUaHlUJu3bUAURY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Bailiwick discussion for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:22:57 -0000

On 12/10/2021, Tony Finch wrote:
> I view the term "in-bailiwick" as no longer suitable for use in careful
> writing because its meaning has become thorougly confused and muddled.

I agree that without further qualification the meaning of "in-bailiwick" 
isn't clear.  And I'm personally not convinced that usage of the word is 
restricted just to NS records returned in referrals.

--Vladimir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email