Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt> (Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status) to Informational RFC

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 05 September 2019 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAE4120B1F; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCF8fVrLuNo2; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EE9120900; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46PXpb69kDzFDF; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1567716519; bh=lPWoj1JbuAqte991v6MpQ5o4thzti9H7fnK8rq1BntA=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=NKlKhwnZe6i3dC8GOF2MjY1J6HDY7IFge7n2G0iboRylXPCuiYTSt9lC9urIWwv3b WCUiVut+zJibdXszWNFTSF5H6H1Xob8l5h7Je9ha45RtXmACiPKd/c+QX94HXai00b U8TlolKgvJpD1nALgme7fE0AisUFm7qUTJhklwIk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAmLFM6olhdU; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:48:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.165.5.94] (unknown [199.119.233.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4A5935297B; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:48:36 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca A4A5935297B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <m2pnke8pm2.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:48:34 -0400
Cc: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB75CAA6-E780-4F45-A3E8-C435497B4942@nohats.ca>
References: <156764055661.22821.274141071401649127.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACfw2hijNQOznSFG4JqXFzwDwKy8orkxhi4=1J-Yz4_H_-HxEw@mail.gmail.com> <m2pnke8pm2.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/G9LlacybmBzh7wTIbbaUSO-r24Y>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt> (Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 20:48:45 -0000

Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> I support this.  DLV was a mistake
> 
> yup.  but resistance was futile.

It was very useful at the beginning, especially before the root was signed. I used it to get DNSSEC from a number of TLDs and could not have done that without DLV.

It served its purpose well, and it should be formally retired and this document should get published.

Paul