IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] updated to draft-wing-dnsop-structured-dns-error-page-01

Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> Fri, 12 November 2021 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pspacek@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCB13A0EAD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=O8y3ZRIu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=RGL/FAka
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEOtwgjP-eDC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFA13A0B95 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3062E4344F7; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1636731541; bh=uCRzwUHQERftxoQS2TzFWHAhj4eOijEoXlPCRG0PT30=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=O8y3ZRIubZl6olyjoUxtA9VOQ3zxY8h86Ut+M1AF62P5se+VoBJ6fgAz9rIBynMF5 YCZMKwqp0WMwF+F81kNzMqU93JM41Z4gmx+18CrtLviE+h3amTDsp/CKfTu/R7tnx8 iZtaiqhox123AKuWiVETVyLeMneRByuZ1Ym03DnA=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224FFF09D39; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE305F09D3A; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org EE305F09D3A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1636731541; bh=cnci5AQJt2ZyKT2J9zRsdHPVFHRtXVAK6rV2bd0708E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=RGL/FAkaM+ZfSEAkGt0vbAWA7nFgZxIP15dDiB71ar30YWG1eCSxhpcfRi2Oo3A1c mxz/YSGUEoe1QSVdXDmwPCh7g60y8aSAIyVGpd2kAbv0+gRbk5aTIs2m1ff21otMxu BuxEY4Ct3LC76tLW74ObPYrsFpQmZg06Y+HW60ts=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id IZF0qKnSntJi; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.157] (ip-86-49-254-49.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.254.49]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23820F09D39; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <6a75d368-400e-9b56-8220-73ec7ebbae22@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 16:38:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <D1CF0779-EAB3-4759-8F50-643E9EC8C490@gmail.com> <d7f55c0d-0746-9c74-2ff1-ebdcec7ad45e@isc.org> <2144593653.33984.1636631982620@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <YY55fPEe5rhilZFr@nic.fr>
From: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <YY55fPEe5rhilZFr@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GQxHIxYVvMpJH7ng2ir9Dvj_gHE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] updated to draft-wing-dnsop-structured-dns-error-page-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:39:21 -0000

On 12. 11. 21 15:26, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:59:42PM +0100,
>   Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote
>   a message of 24 lines which said:
> 
>> I don't want to speak for them (I don't know if they are on this
>> list, but they definitely are on ADD) but in past discussions around
>> this concept they recognized its potential usefulness (apart maybe
>> from a specific browser which seems to have a principle stance
>> against DNS filters) but were concerned about the security of the
>> mechanism, i.e. the risk that it could be used to present to the
>> user a phishing or misleading page,
> 
> Moreover, I have serious doubts that DNS configuration errors could be
> meaningfully reported to end users. It would be very difficult to make
> them understandable and, since we deal with errors in authoritative
> servers, the client could not do anything, anyway.
> 
> I have nothing against informing users (some will find that useful)
> but we should focus on reporting to the zone manager, not to the
> client.

Seems like you are talking about a different document? Or are you 
suggesting the document to be dropped entirely because it goes in a 
completely wrong direction?

-- 
Petr Špaček

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email