IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Seeking discussion of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-01

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Sun, 03 May 2015 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A271A0203 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.269
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.269 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJhxSWSonUjD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC6B1A01E7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 May 2015 00:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vpn14.hotsplots.net ([80.237.234.132] helo=shane-eeepc.home.time-travellers.org) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1YoohF-00089u-65; Sun, 03 May 2015 07:52:19 +0000
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 09:47:50 +0200
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20150503094750.32ff0881@shane-eeepc.home.time-travellers.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150501232130.GA13049@isc.org>
References: <20150501232130.GA13049@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/H9e9n5MzWppOAqhy8x-g6z8Wnx8>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Seeking discussion of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 07:52:58 -0000

Evan,

On Friday, 2015-05-01 23:21:30 +0000,
Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
> Speaking for myself, I agree with Mark: the benefits of including
> error codes in the option are slim and other mechanisms such as
> FORMERR work just as well in almost every scenario, so it doesn't
> justify the cost in additional complexity.

This makes sense to me. Best to tackle a single issue at a time.

Although perhaps a next logical step would be to think about improving
the error code situation in general. :)

Cheers,

--
Shane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email