IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Seeking discussion of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-01

"Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com> Fri, 01 May 2015 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dwessels@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0A71A0011 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 16:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LxlnhrWbdVe7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f100.google.com (mail-oi0-f100.google.com [209.85.218.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F951A0010 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiax69 with SMTP id x69so3834794oia.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 May 2015 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=oOUnA2Ey8IQBjmVByOzLxiJNGca2CiXhHIlPYTwIIIY=; b=F95Jmh1uA4XxGxywIY0PsUM3lJzSXqbIbYYxPZioFGik2Uj0cZT6PFBWC3tep0C/hp d7LUpTWvlfFMhk603Ll8VPqHC4J4N3BBb5ZOm/9Kjt5vJG22hXYaGt8ds5WupDIgEb7j k4GCWYRnn8ojoDp5YlDV4nSM5cv5gzZ3pd42b7w3Lp8Gqp/wF7BEQrlfoTD06DAsdcQI bZy+cTsbWrbrFT7ACAwyH1MRS4+VZpHvr9A2cnSDhxNP39j+gAJGYZaLd8sLpOam6+rr f4mxIJ5BAjgjYhNu+K6Y/xXlGmprde3edHCB9B4aYevFbRI/ocrdDs//4tpmps23mIHE o/9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUSOyIxJRMO2npZRAk5dY0nqHZcCFRQHkvefU6TKMTvZhRrsBBLSsThiDc8bTU8yz2lBCiNm5t/n2ItttVpXIEL2HKkA==
X-Received: by 10.42.90.138 with SMTP id k10mr17227757icm.50.1430524312080; Fri, 01 May 2015 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n17sm7718igx.2.2015.05.01.16.51.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2015 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01 [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t41NpojF020989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 May 2015 19:51:51 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 1 May 2015 19:51:50 -0400
From: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Seeking discussion of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-01
Thread-Index: AQHQhGWett4xjyY29E2h7ZgVRoTFcJ1oDdeA
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 23:51:49 +0000
Message-ID: <D43ACFE4-3619-4034-9130-35550916F069@verisign.com>
References: <20150501232130.GA13049@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150501232130.GA13049@isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6D59FE4406143045B27A1EFC3EBF0190@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ur2QgEcFXYtI23CYHCdrqLlpy7g>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Seeking discussion of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 23:51:54 -0000

> On May 1, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> Speaking for myself, I agree with Mark: the benefits of including error
> codes in the option are slim and other mechanisms such as FORMERR work
> just as well in almost every scenario, so it doesn't justify the cost in
> additional complexity.

I'm inclined to agree.  I was a bit torn because there have been so many other
times I wished a certain feature had additional error signaling, but I found it
hard to justify the complexity in this case.

DW

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email