Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 14 April 2020 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4AE3A0A13 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEa-1GEI-Pnp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ADBE3A09F6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:ed85:ad69:1e97:9524] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:ed85:ad69:1e97:9524]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D000B074A; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <060513e7-742d-6de9-cf16-c367fbb13845@redbarn.org> <DE1C0DEF-0479-4AF9-9D31-AEE2ADA67C46@fl1ger.de>
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Message-ID: <70fa32cc-64ff-0a76-9025-b4c770ccc0e2@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:59:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DE1C0DEF-0479-4AF9-9D31-AEE2ADA67C46@fl1ger.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Iw2JydLyI3H8jnXsJEyYq52CB7A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:59:37 -0000


Ralf Weber wrote on 2020-04-14 08:57:
> Moin!
> 
> On 14 Apr 2020, at 17:43, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> DS should never have been placed at the delegation point, and has led 
>> to a decade or longer of bugs and corner cases and complexity. it 
>> ought to have been a nephew domain of the delegation point, but, in 
>> the parent:
>>
>> so instead of example.com DS, it should have been example._dnssec.com DS.
> Just to clarify if I understand that correct. The DS for example.net 
> would be example._dnssec.net DS. Correct? So would you propose to do 
> example._ns2.net NS2 to distinguish parent and child NS2 records?

i didn't understand the semantics of having more than one NS2, so i 
don't know.

-- 
P Vixie