IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFD71B2B9B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:34:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8folwapxDYTz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CF61B2C92 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v36so4256832qgd.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:28:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ag/72dF1IL54tiPL8z/vgjESPmFVPf+i7EBiKtDk2qY=; b=VX16qX0CUG2xOGUJEgNIvuaCd9P3nlGAWpW2yCHVTgklkz/8IFHDZTRsAwRcle1Yyr j/rDA60z70FU/2LtQtADD++rLpH4MaR+iRqJuOkCl6wm4hjxa1B0m6JFdlc5Bube+4kh RnEo1nXjMoqSzmQJN84dzZTkoeQS2orkt1y3tJ05LXAWzjA28jOltqd9ZGm7fKMVDNJ3 jvSGNLBm02D1fcGKsjrlPsU6TdXYDZj+tcVoCnqGfh+VzWuzilaw52vl3wDO9PFBjjxi 0z2rjcTWKF+zqVjTJ9JaW4lXDuEH2WFwVK1wlCyQdZhWC/uBWeGirtJDnidlYUeKNi+u hwHQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.171.9 with SMTP id r9mr63481679qhr.93.1450351735867; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from twicinski-ltm.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.236.150]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a132sm4458860qhd.44.2015.12.17.03.28.54 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:28:54 -0800 (PST)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20151216053519.1023.71032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20151217101526.GA6072@nic.fr>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56729C75.1000304@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:28:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151217101526.GA6072@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/MBW8nL3GAC-J84FvDkcx0ejfC9E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:34:07 -0000


On 12/17/15 5:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:35:19PM -0800,
>   Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote
>   a message of 125 lines which said:
>
>> I found the document to be a difficult read because of the
>> language. [...] We do better when we avoid this kind of invective in
>> our standards specs, [...] We really shouldn't write standards that
>> sound like rants...
>
> Interesting. I don't remember these issues about tone being raised in
> the working group. What do you think?
>

Stephane

I remember suggesting some edits to make the document say things a bit 
more polite, but 1) I seemed to have missed this; but 2) the document is 
listed as Experimental for now, with the idea there would be a more 
formal document that reached Proposed Standards.

tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email