Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 27 December 2015 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A5D1A6F65 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:47:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kTC3_lZk57Cq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C991A6F63 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id E9EEF3BBB7; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:47:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D93D2F05621; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:44:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:44:02 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151227214402.GA11023@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20151216053519.1023.71032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151216053519.1023.71032.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 15.10 (wily)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/j6d93B0NvwXdacvtVjKVZsIkbQs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:47:32 -0000

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:35:19PM -0800,
 Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote 
 a message of 124 lines which said:

> NEW
>    For instance, some authoritative name servers embedded in load
>    balancers reply properly to A queries but send REFUSED to NS queries.
>    This behaviour violates the DNS protocol (see Section ??? of [RFC??],
>    and improvements to the DNS are impeded if we accept such behaviour
>    as normal.
> END

Does anyone has an idea of the reference to use to replace the "???"

For me, such a behavior is so obviously wrong that I cannot think of a
precise chapter-and-verse to quote...