Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bailiwick, Out-of-bailiwick, In-domain, Sibling domain

The text for "in-bailwick" is too restrictive, it doesn’t just cover NS records or
glue records.

In-bailwick refers to records that in the normal course of DNS resolution
would have been requested of by the server the current response is from.
e.g. if you are querying a .com server then all records in the response that end
with .com are in-bailwick.

Mark

> On 5 Dec 2017, at 5:27 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> Greetings again.
> 
> Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since RFC 7719 can be a bit tricky. This week, we hope you will look at the definitions in the draft for:
> - In-bailiwick
> - Out-of-bailiwick
> - In-domain
> - Sibling domain
> Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the definitions should change.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> [[ As a reminder, we asked the following last week, but got no reply: For the past many versions of the terminology-bis draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/), Section 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based on the facets listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily on the list earlier, but it is also a pretty big change, so we want to be sure that it is what the WG wants. Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the definitions should change. ]]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org