[DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bailiwick, Out-of-bailiwick, In-domain, Sibling domain
"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 04 December 2017 18:27 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9761286B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:27:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6Lielxn59jW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5EB127B60 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [169.254.211.6] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id vB4IPwP1042671 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:26:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [169.254.211.6]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 10:27:32 -0800
Message-ID: <707A270D-94DA-4651-84DC-409FAA6793F7@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.7r5425)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ez8X67L6ZS406GkVx0f9nEblwHM>
Subject: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bailiwick, Out-of-bailiwick, In-domain, Sibling domain
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:27:37 -0000
Greetings again. Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since RFC 7719 can be a bit tricky. This week, we hope you will look at the definitions in the draft for: - In-bailiwick - Out-of-bailiwick - In-domain - Sibling domain Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the definitions should change. --Paul Hoffman [[ As a reminder, we asked the following last week, but got no reply: For the past many versions of the terminology-bis draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/), Section 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based on the facets listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily on the list earlier, but it is also a pretty big change, so we want to be sure that it is what the WG wants. Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the definitions should change. ]]
- [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bail… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… fujiwara
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… fujiwara
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Niall O'Reilly